Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 128

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 92 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2010)

Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Doc. 128

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64037 Email: [e-mail] JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 Email: [e-mail] STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717 Email: [e-mail] ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN (State Bar No. 197572) Email: [e-mail] ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686 Email: [e-mail] WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and PATRICK R. BROGAN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS AND PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PERTAINING TO FORTINET INC.'S OPPOSITION TO PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT REGARDING THE `990 PATENT

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)

3989502_1.DOC

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:

Having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc.'s administrative motion to file under seal portions of Fortinet's Opposition to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s ("PAN") Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Regarding the `990 Patent ("Opposition"), the Declaration of Dr. Matthew A. Bishop in Support of Fortinet's Opposition and exhibits thereto ("Bishop Declaration"), and Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Stefani E. Shanberg in Support of Fortinet's Opposition ("Confidential Exhibit") pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet's administrative motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Bishop Declaration, Confidential Exhibit, and the following portions of Fortinet's Opposition are filed under seal: a) TOC i.21-24; b) 1:10-14 (following "During this deposition . . ." through ". . . This testimony"); c) 9:11-11:21; d) 12:22-13:17; e) 13:24-25 (following "PAN firewalls (1) . . ." through ". . .To advance its theory"); f) 14:1-3; g) 14:6-20 (following "Mr. Zuk testified . . ." through ". . .Because Mr. Zuk's deposition testimony"); h) 14:22 (following "PAN's motion that . . ." through ". . .PAN's motion"); i) 14:27-15:11 (following "because it. . ." through ". . .Id. at 41:14-21"); j) 15:14-17:2; k) 18:10-12 (following "as discussed. . ." through ". . .Details regarding further"); and l) 18:26-28 (following "many relevant aspects of the. . ." through end of the footnote) IT IS SO ORDERED

June

30,

2010

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge -13989502_1.DOC

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
FORTINET'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF FORTINET'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO.: CV 08-05371 MMC

Presented by: WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC.

-2-

3989502_1.DOC