Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 176

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 165 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2010)

Download PDF
Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al Doc. 176 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64037 Email: mladra@wsgr.com JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 Email: jyoon@wsgr.com STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717 Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN (State Bar No. 197572) Email: achung@wsgr.com ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686 Email: rbrewer@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and PATRICK R. BROGAN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PERTAINING TO PLAINTIFF FORTINET, INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT AND AMEND DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULES 3-1 AND 3-6 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 4020640_1.DOC Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc.'s administrative motion to file under seal portions of Fortinet's Motion for Leave to Supplement and Amend Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rules 3-1 and 3-6 ("Motion for Leave to Supplement and Amend Infringement Contentions") pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(c) and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet's administrative motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the following portions of Fortinet's Objections shall be filed under seal: a) 4:21-5:4 (beginning with "For example, . . ." through the end of paragraph); b) 6:16-7:2 (beginning of the line through the end of paragraph); c) 7:17-18 (following "(e.g., . . ." through the end of parenthetical); d) 7:25-26 (following "to such . . ." through the end of sentence); e) 8:1-2 (following "Nir Zuk that . . ." through the end of sentence); f) 8:2-4 (following "additional evidence that the . . ." through ". . . processors,"); g) 12:5-11 (beginning with "discussing . . ." through the end of paragraph). IT IS SO ORDERED July 19, 2010 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge Presented by: WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg Stefani E. Shanberg Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC. ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) -1- 4020640_1.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?