Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 202

STIPULATION AND ORDER 189 Setting Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions: Motion Hearing set for 10/1/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 8/16/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825) ddurie@durietangri.com RAGESH K. TANGRI (SBN 159477) rtangri@durietangri.com RYAN M. KENT (SBN 220441) rkent@durietangri.com JOSEPH C. GRATZ (SBN 240676) jgratz@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiff PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. and PATRICK R. BROGAN WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI MICHAEL A. LADRA (State Bar No. 64037) Email: mladra@wsgr.com JAMES C. YOON (State Bar No. 177155) Email: jyoon@wsgr.com STEFANI E. SHANBERG (State Bar No. 206717) Email: sshanberg@wsgr.com ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN (State Bar No. 197572) Email: achung@wsgr.com 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC. *E-FILED - 8/16/10* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FORTINET, INC., SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. 5:09-cv-00036-RMW (PVT) STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PENDING MOTIONS Date: October 1, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 6 4th Flr. The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte Plaintiff and Counter Defendant, v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and PATRICK R. BROGAN Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiff. STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PENDING MOTIONS / CASE NO. 5:09-CV-00036-RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record that, if the Court approves, the current dates relating to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s motions for summary judgment and Fortinet's Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions and related briefing be amended as follows: Event Fortinet's supplemental brief on summary judgment PAN's supplemental brief on summary judgment Palo Alto Networks' ("PAN's") opposition to Fortinet's Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Fortinet's reply with respect to Fortinet's Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Hearing on Fortinet's Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Current Date None set None set Proposed Date August 10, 2010 August 20, 2010 August 6, 2010 September 3, 2010 August 13, 2010 September 10, 2010 August 27, 2010 October 1, 2010 There have been no previous extensions of time with respect to these dates, and no other calendared dates will be affected by this stipulation. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PENDING MOTIONS / CASE NO. 5:09-CV-00036-RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AGREED: Dated: August 10, 2010 DURIE TANGRI LLP By: /s/ Joseph C. Gratz JOSEPH C. GRATZ Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiff PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. and PATRICK R. BROGAN Dated: August 10, 2010 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI By: /s/ Stefani E. Shanberg STEFANI E. SHANBERG Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC FILER'S ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Joseph C. Gratz, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. Dated: August 10, 2010 /s/ Joseph C. Gratz JOSEPH C. GRATZ [] ORDER Upon stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 16, 2010 HON. RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PENDING MOTIONS / CASE NO. 5:09-CV-00036-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?