Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 203

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 190 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2010)

Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Doc. 203

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL A. LADRA, State Bar No. 64037 Email: [e-mail] JAMES C. YOON, State Bar No. 177155 Email: [e-mail] STEFANI E. SHANBERG, State Bar No. 206717 Email: [e-mail] ARIANA M. CHUNG-HAN (State Bar No. 197572) Email: [e-mail] ROBIN L. BREWER, State Bar No. 253686 Email: [e-mail] WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant FORTINET, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and PATRICK R. BROGAN, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS AND PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL PERTAINING TO PLAINTIFF FORTINET, INC.'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PALO ALTO NETWORK, INC.'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)

4043030_1.DOC

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:

Having considered Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Fortinet, Inc.'s administrative motion to file under seal portions of Fortinet's Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Palo Alto Network, Inc.'s ("PAN") Motions for Summary Judgment ("Supplemental Brief") and the Declaration of Dr. Matthew A. Bishop in Support of Fortinet's Opposition ("Bishop Supplemental Declaration"), and to file under seal Exhibit B to the Bishop Supplemental Declaration ("Confidential Exhibit") and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Fortinet's administrative motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the following portions of Fortinet's Supplemental Brief and the Bishop Supplemental Declaration shall be filed under seal: a) 2:20-3:5 (beginning with "because" through "387)"); b) Footnote 3; c) Footnote 5; d) 6:13-7:2 (beginning with "Mr. Zuk" through end of paragraph); e) Footnote 9; f) 7:4-7:12 (beginning with "because" through end of paragraph); g) 7:16-8:13 (all four bulleted paragraphs); h) 9:6-12 (beginning with "explaining" through end of sentence); Fortinet further requests that the following portions of the Bishop Supplemental Declaration be filed under seal: i) Paragraph 4; j) 5:22-25 (beginning with "the `packet flow cache'" through end of sentence); k) Paragraphs 19-25 In addition, the Confidential Exhibit shall be filed under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED

August

19,

2010

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION CASE NO.: 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)

-1-

4043030_1.DOC