Fortinet, Inc v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 60 Motion to Amend/Correct Invalidity Contentions. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825) ddurie@durietangri.com RAGESH K. TANGRI (SBN 159477) rtangri@durietangri.com RYAN M. KENT (SBN 220441) rkent@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 362-6666 Facsimile: (415) 236-6300 Attorneys for Defendants - Counterclaim Plaintiff PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. and Defendant PATRICK R. BROGAN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FORTINET, INC., Plaintiff, v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., and PATRICK R. BROGAN, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS Case No. 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) ORDER Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte ORDER Case No. 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: Having considered Defendant Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6 for United States Patent No. 7,519,990, the papers in support and all other matters presented to the Court and good cause appearing; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6 for United States Patent No. 7,519,990 is GRANTED. May 3, 2010 By: The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge 1 ORDER Case No. 09-CV-00036-RMW (PVT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?