Hall v. Tehrani et al

Filing 33

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 24 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Dispositive Motion; Denying 27 Motion for Extension of Time to File as Moot. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 *E-FILED - 12/8/09*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD G. HALL, Plaintiff, v. JASMINE A. TEHRANI, et al., Defendants. /

No. C 09-0057 RMW (PR) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS MOOT (Docket Nos. 24, 27)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S. C. § 1983. Presently, before the court is defendants' motion to change time to file a dispositive motion and plaintiff's request for an extension of time for service of the court's summons. On October 22, 2009, defendants filed a motion to change time for their dispositive motion along with a declaration (docket nos. 27, 28). The declaration stated that Deputy Attorney Kyle Lewis was the attorney for defendants Tehrani and Murphy. The declaration also stated that service on both defendants was not completed until October 9, 2009. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS defendants' motion for extension of time. The time in which defendants may file their dispositive motion will be extended up to and including January 21, 2010. Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the court and served on defendants no later than thirty (30) days after the date defendants' motion is filed. If
Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Change Time to File a Dispositive Motion; Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time as Moot P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.09\Hall057EOT-Service-DispMtn.wpd

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

defendants wish to file a reply brief, they shall do so no later than fifteen (15) days after the date plaintiff's opposition is filed. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time for service of court's summons (docket no. 24) is DENIED as moot. This order terminates docket nos. 24, 27. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

12/7/09

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Change Time to File a Dispositive Motion; Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Service as Moot P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.09\Hall057EOT-Service-DispMtn.wpd

2