Hermosillo v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

Filing 18

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Settlement. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/28/2010 09:00 AM. Stipulated Dismissal or Show Cause Response due by 6/18/2010. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss this action. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge James Ware on 5/4/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Raymond Hermosillo, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 09-00158 JW ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMEN SETTLEMENTT CONFERENCE

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Defendant. /

T April 22, 2010, Daniel Bowling management conference on July 6, 2009. The parties Onhis case was scheduled for a caseof the Court's ADR's program filed a Certification of Mediation notifying the Court Joint Case Management Statement. In light of settlement. (See conferred and duly submitted athat the above-entitled matter has reached a full the parties' Joint Docket Item No. 17.) In light of the settlement, the Court vacates all trial and pretrial dates. On or before June 18, 2010, the parties follows: Statement, the Court ORDERS as shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (a The is not 2009 case management conference is VACATED. If1) dismissalJuly 6, filed by the specified date, all parties shall appear in Courtroom No. 8, 4th Floor, United States District Court, General Order No. 56, attached to this Order, 28,applicable to (2) The Court finds that 280 South First Street, San Jose, Ca on June is 2010 at 9 a.m. and to show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). this 18, Plaintiff's primary claim a an ADA violation. Accordingly, the parties shall On or before June case2010, the parties shall file is joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause. The joint statement shall set forth the status of the activities of the parties for finalizing the comply with the provisions of General Order No. 56. The timing provisions of settlement and how much additional time is requested to finalize and file the dismissal. If a voluntary dismissalgis ph 3 of General Order No. 56 Show run from the date ofbe automatically Para ra filed as ordered, the Order to shall Cause hearing will this Order. vacated. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss this action. Dated: July 1, 2009 JAMES WARE Dated: May 4, 2010 _____________________________ United States District Judge JAMES WARE United States District Judge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Brian Gearinger [e-mail] Celia Louise McGuinness [e-mail] Joseph Patrick Ryan [e-mail] Paul Leslie Rein [e-mail] Robert Stephen Marsh LaRoe [e-mail]

Dated: May 4, 2010 July 1, 2009

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28