Pearson et al v. Stryker Corporation et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE re 28 Stipulation. The Clerk shall close this file. ***Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/9/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010)

Download PDF
Pearson et al v. Stryker Corporation et al Doc. 29 UNIT ED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Defendants HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP. AND STRYKER CORPORATION ER N D IS T IC T R OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION LAWRENCE PEARSON and MICHELLE PEARSON, Plaintiffs, v. STRYKER CORPORATION and HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORPORATION d/b/a STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS, Defendants. CV 09 ­ 0221 JW (PVT) [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case Mgmnt. Conf.: July 12, 2010 Complaint Filed: Jan. 16, 2009 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have stipulated to the voluntary dismissal of this action in its entirety against all Defendants without prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs. AND WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants have further stipulated that if Plaintiffs do not file a renewed suit within 45 days subsequent to this dismissal, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerks shall close this file. July 9, 2010 DATED: ___________________________________ Honorable James Ware United States District Court Judge LA/976594v1 -1CASE NO. CV09-0221 JW (PVT) ORDER ON STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dockets.Justia.com R A C LI ALPH A. CAMPILLO (Bar No. 70376) MARIO HORWITZ (Bar No. 110965) SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 801 South Figueroa Street, 19th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-5556 Telephone: (213) 426-6900 Facsimile: (213) 426-6921 Email: ralph.campillo@sdma.com mario.horwitz@sdma.com S S DISTRICT TE C TA FO mes Wa Judge Ja re R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?