Wise v. Walker

Filing 36

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 35 Motion for Reconsideration. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANARE WISE, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 WARDEN JAMES WALKER, 14 Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 09-0268 RMW (PR) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Docket No. 35) 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After reviewing the briefs and the underlying record, the court 18 concluded that petitioner was not entitled to relief based on the claims presented and denied the 19 petition on August 2, 2010. (Docket No. 23.) On October 9, 2012, the United States Court of 20 Appeal denied petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability. Petitioner also filed a 21 petition for certiorari and a petition for rehearing with the Unites States Supreme Court. Both 22 were denied. (Docket Nos. 32 and 34.) On July 17, 2014, petitioner filed the current motion to 23 set aside default judgment. (Docket No. 35.) 24 The court construes petitioner’s motion as a motion for relief from judgment, pursuant to 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 provides for reconsideration where one or more of the following is shown: (1) mistake, 27 inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that by due diligence 28 Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration P:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.09\Wise268denrecon.wpd 1 could not have been discovered before the court’s decision; (3) fraud by the adverse party; (4) 2 voiding of the judgment; (5) satisfaction of the judgment; (6) any other reason justifying relief. 3 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); School Dist. 1J v. ACandS Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993). 4 Although couched in broad terms, subparagraph (6) requires a showing that the grounds 5 justifying relief are extraordinary. Twentieth Century - Fox Film Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d 6 1338, 1341 (9th Cir. 1981). 7 Petitioner does not make a showing of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable 8 neglect. He does not set forth any newly discovered evidence, fraud, or any grounds for finding 9 that the judgment is void or has been satisfied. Nor does he set forth any other reason justifying 10 relief. Rule 60(b)(6) affords courts the discretion and power “to vacate judgments whenever 11 such action is appropriate to accomplish justice.” Phelps v. Alameida, 569 F.3d 1120, 1135 (9th 12 Cir. 2009). 13 In the present motion, filed four years after this court entered judgment against petitioner, 14 petitioner argues that the judgment should be set aside because he believes that the prosecutor 15 presented false evidence at his trial and committed prosecutorial misconduct. Petitioner has not 16 demonstrated extraordinary circumstances. Petitioner is merely rearguing the claims that he 17 presented in his petition in 2010. 18 19 Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. No further filings shall be accepted in this closed case. 20 This order terminates docket number 35. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: _______________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration P:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.09\Wise268denrecon.wpd 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LANARE WISE, Case Number: CV09-00268 RMW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. JAMES WALKER et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on September 24, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Lanare Wise T76040 C.S.P. Sacramento C6-218 P.O. Box 290066 Represa, CA 95671-0066 Dated: September 24, 2014 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?