Wise v. Walker
Filing
36
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Denying 35 Motion for Reconsideration. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LANARE WISE,
11
Petitioner,
12
vs.
13
WARDEN JAMES WALKER,
14
Respondent.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 09-0268 RMW (PR)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
(Docket No. 35)
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
17
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. After reviewing the briefs and the underlying record, the court
18
concluded that petitioner was not entitled to relief based on the claims presented and denied the
19
petition on August 2, 2010. (Docket No. 23.) On October 9, 2012, the United States Court of
20
Appeal denied petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability. Petitioner also filed a
21
petition for certiorari and a petition for rehearing with the Unites States Supreme Court. Both
22
were denied. (Docket Nos. 32 and 34.) On July 17, 2014, petitioner filed the current motion to
23
set aside default judgment. (Docket No. 35.)
24
The court construes petitioner’s motion as a motion for relief from judgment, pursuant to
25
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
26
provides for reconsideration where one or more of the following is shown: (1) mistake,
27
inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that by due diligence
28
Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.09\Wise268denrecon.wpd
1
could not have been discovered before the court’s decision; (3) fraud by the adverse party; (4)
2
voiding of the judgment; (5) satisfaction of the judgment; (6) any other reason justifying relief.
3
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); School Dist. 1J v. ACandS Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993).
4
Although couched in broad terms, subparagraph (6) requires a showing that the grounds
5
justifying relief are extraordinary. Twentieth Century - Fox Film Corp. v. Dunnahoo, 637 F.2d
6
1338, 1341 (9th Cir. 1981).
7
Petitioner does not make a showing of mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable
8
neglect. He does not set forth any newly discovered evidence, fraud, or any grounds for finding
9
that the judgment is void or has been satisfied. Nor does he set forth any other reason justifying
10
relief. Rule 60(b)(6) affords courts the discretion and power “to vacate judgments whenever
11
such action is appropriate to accomplish justice.” Phelps v. Alameida, 569 F.3d 1120, 1135 (9th
12
Cir. 2009).
13
In the present motion, filed four years after this court entered judgment against petitioner,
14
petitioner argues that the judgment should be set aside because he believes that the prosecutor
15
presented false evidence at his trial and committed prosecutorial misconduct. Petitioner has not
16
demonstrated extraordinary circumstances. Petitioner is merely rearguing the claims that he
17
presented in his petition in 2010.
18
19
Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. No further filings shall be
accepted in this closed case.
20
This order terminates docket number 35.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED: _______________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration
P:\PRO-SE\RMW\HC.09\Wise268denrecon.wpd
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LANARE WISE,
Case Number: CV09-00268 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
JAMES WALKER et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on September 24, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Lanare Wise T76040
C.S.P. Sacramento
C6-218
P.O. Box 290066
Represa, CA 95671-0066
Dated: September 24, 2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?