Tietsworth v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al

Filing 125

STIPULATION AND ORDER REVISING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE (approving 124 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/16/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)

Download PDF
Jennie Lee Anderson (CA Bar No. 203586) 41 Lori E. Andrus (CA Bar No. 205816) 1 2 Andrus Anderson LLP 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 986-1400; Fax: (415) 986-1474 4 jennie@andrusanderson.com, lori@andrusanderson.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 5 [Additional counsel listed on signature page] **E-Filed 9/16/2011** 6 Clement L. Glynn (CA Bar No. 057117) 7 James M. Hanlon, Jr. (CA Bar No. 214096) Glynn & Finley, LLP 8 100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 500 Walnut Creek, California 94596 9 Tel: (925) 210-2800; Fax: (925) 945-1975 cglynn@glynnfinley.com, jhanlon@glynnfinley.com 10 11 Michael T. Williams (CO Bar No. 33172; admitted pro hac vice) Galen D. Bellamy (CA Bar No. 231792) 12 Joel S. Neckers (CO Bar No. 40886; admitted pro hac vice) Wheeler Trigg Kennedy LLP 13 1801 California Street, Suite 3600 Denver, Colorado 80202 14 Tel: (303) 244-1800; Fax: (303) 244-1879 15 williams@wtotrial.com, bellamy@wtotrial.com, neckers@wtotrial.com 16 Attorneys for Sears, Roebuck and Co. ,and Whirlpool Corporation 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 19 20 21 22 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA--SAN JOSE DIVISION RENEE TIETSWORTH, SUZANNE REBRO, SONDRA SIMPSON, and JOHN CAREY, On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, 25 26 27 STIPULATION AND ---------------- ORDER PROPOSED REVISING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE Plaintiffs, 23 24 CASE NO. C09-00288-JF Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel vs. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., and WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendants. 28 Stipulation and Proposed Order Revising Case Management Schedule 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that the Case 2 Management Schedule adopted by the Court on August 10, 2011 (Docket # 122), should be 3 revised in the manner described below to allow time for the parties to complete discovery and 4 resolve any related discovery disputes in advance of Plaintiffs’ anticipated motion for class 5 certification, and in support thereof, state as follows: 6 1. Under the current Case Management Schedule: 7 a. The parties are to complete expert depositions on September 23, 2011. 8 b. Plaintiffs are to file their motion for class certification on October 11, 2011. 9 c. Defendants are to file their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification on November 8, 2011. 10 11 d. Plaintiffs are to file reply to their motion for class certification on December 2, 2011. 12 e. Subject to the Court’s calendar, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification should be December 16, 2011. 13 14 15 2. Defendants anticipate completing the outstanding document production with 16 respect to all document requests that were served prior to August 30, 2011, by September 23, 17 2011. The parties have exchanged expert reports, but have not completed expert depositions. 18 Additional time is needed to respond to additional discovery requests, to resolve certain 19 discovery disputes, to complete the inspection of Class Representative Renee Tietsworth’s 20 washing machine, and to take the necessary expert depositions before the parties can brief class 21 certification. 22 23 3. Counsel for both parties met and conferred and have stipulated and agreed that 24 the Case Management Schedule should be revised as follows: 25 a. The parties are to complete expert depositions on December 2, 2012. 26 b. Plaintiffs are to file their motion for class certification on December 16, 2012. 27 28 c. Defendants are to file their opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification on January 27, 2012. 1 Stipulation and Proposed Order Revising Case Management Schedule 1 2 3 4 5 d. Plaintiffs are to file their reply to their motion for class certification on February 24, 2012. e. Subject to the Court’s availability, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification should be held in mid-March, 2012. SO STIPULATED: Dated: September 16, 2011 6 /s/ Ed Kilpela_____ 7 Michael T. Williams Galen D. Bellamy 8 Edwin Kilpela, Jr. Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP 9 1801 California Street, Suite 3600 Denver, CO 80202 10 Telephone: (303) 244-1800 Facsimile: (303) 244-1879 11 /s/ Lori E. Andrus_____ Jennie Lee Anderson Lori E. Andrus Andrus Anderson LLP 155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 986-1400 Facsimile: (415) 986-1474 12 Attorneys for Defendants Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Whirlpool Corporation 13 Natalie Finkelman James C. Shah Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah, LLP 35 East State Street Media, PA 19063 Telephone: (610) 891-9880 Facsimile: (610) 891-9883 14 15 16 Lesley E. Weaver (SBN 191305) Shepherd Finkelman Miller & Shah, LLP 199 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2255 Telephone: (415) 992-7282 Facsimile: (415) 489-7701 17 18 19 20 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation and Proposed Order Revising Case Management Schedule 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 2 3 4 9/16/2011 Dated: _____________ __________________________________ Hon. Jeremy M. Fogel United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and Proposed Order Revising Case Management Schedule 1 2 ECF CERTIFICATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § X.B., the filing attorney attests that she has obtained 3 concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document. 4 /s/ Lori E. Andrus 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 Stipulation and Proposed Order Revising Case Management Schedule CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on September 16, 2011, I electronically filed the above document 3 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 4 to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Court’s Electronic Mail Notice List. 5 I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 6 foregoing is true and correct. /s/ Lori E. Andrus 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Stipulation and Proposed Order Revising Case Management Schedule

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?