May v. Washington Mutual Brokerage Holdings, Inc. et al
Filing
175
ORDER GRANTING 174 Notice (Other) of Dismissal filed by Myrra May, ***ALL Deadlines terminated. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/10/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2014)
5
6
7
10
11
S
d wa
J u d ge E
ER
H
14
RT
13
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
12
SHAOBIN ZHU (State Bar No. 257626)
shaobin.zhu@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Stanford Research Park
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone:
(650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
UNIT
ED
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MYRRA MAY
RT
U
O
8
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
rd J . D a
R NIA
4
vila
FO
3
LI
2
KYRA KAZANTIS (State Bar No. 154612)
kyrak@lawfoundation.org
JAMES F. ZAHRADKA (State Bar No. 196822)
jamesz@lawfoundation.org
ANNETTE D. KIRKHAM (State Bar No. 217958)
annettek@lawfoundation.org
KATHERINE M. LEHE (State Bar No. 273472)
katherine.lehe@lawfoundation.org
LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY
FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT
152 North Third Street, Third Floor
San Jose, CA 95112
Telephone:
(408)280-2410
Facsimile:
(408)293-0106
A
1
N
15
C
OF
D IS T IC T
R
7/10/2014
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN JOSE DIVISION
19
MYRRA MAY,
Case No.: 09-00459 EJD
20
Plaintiff
21
22
23
v.
PLAINITFF MYRRA MAY’S
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE COMPLAINT WITH
PREJUDICE
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BROKERAGE
HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,
24
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:09- cv-00459 EJD
1
Plaintiff MYRRA MAY, by and through her counsel, Fair Housing Law Project,
2
hereby dismisses her entire complaint, with prejudice, against all defendants, pursuant to a
3
settlement agreement executed by the parties on June 25, 2014.
4
5
The Clerk shall close this file.
Dated: July 9, 2014
FAIR HOUSING LAW PROJECT
6
7
8
By:
/s/
Annette D. Kirkham
Attorneys for Plaintiff Myrra May
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 5:09- cv-00459 EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?