United States of America for the use and Benefit of Countrywide Mechanical Systems, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Company et al

Filing 37

ORDER DENYING 36 Request to Appear By Telephone filed by United States of America for the use and Benefit of Countywide Mechanical Systems, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 09/03/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2010)

Download PDF
United States of America for the use and Benefit of Countywide Mechani...rch Insurance Company et al Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ** E-filed September 3, 2010 ** NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION United States of America for the Use and Benefit of COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, a Missouri corporation; J.M.R. CONSTRUCTION CORP., a California corporation; and DOES 110, inclusive, Defendants. ____________________________________/ Plaintiff's counsel submits a request to appear by telephone at the Further Case Management Conference set for September 7, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. The court finds good cause lacking and, accordingly, DENIES the request. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 3, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C09-00509 HRL ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE [Re: Docket No. 36] For the Northern District of California Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C 09-00509 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: George Richard Gore Timothy Joseph Nash ggorelaw@aol.com tjnash@crbondlaw.com, tjnash@crbondlaw.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?