Eclectic Properties East, LLC et al v. The Marcus & Millichap Company et al
Filing
336
FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/8/2012. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
E-FILED on
6/8/2012
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
ECLECTIC PROPERTIES EAST, LLC, a
California Limited Liability Company, et al.,
No. C-09-00511 RMW
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
CERTAIN DEFENDANTS
15
16
THE MARCUS & MILLICHAP COMPANY,
a California corporation, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
On March 5, 2012, the court granted motions to dismiss brought or joined by all defendants
20
who have appeared in this action. The court finds that there is no just reason for delay and therefore
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of defendants The Marcus &
22
Millichap Company; Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services Inc.; Marcus & Millichap
23
Real Estate Investment Brokerage Company; Sovereign Investment Company; Sovereign Scranton
24
LLC; Sovereign CC, LLC; Sovereign JF, LLC; Paul A. Morabito; Tibarom NY LLC; Tibarom PA
25
LLC; Baruk Management, Inc.; PGP Valuation, Inc.; Glen D. Kunofsky; Marcus Muirhead; Sean
26
///
27
///
28
///
FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS—No. C-09-00511 RMW
1
Perkin; Donald Emas; Andrew Lesher; Stewart Weston; Brice Head; Daizy Gomez; and Bret King
2
against plaintiffs, and that plaintiffs take nothing by way of their claims against these parties.
3
4
5
DATED:
June 8, 2012
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS—No. C-09-00511 RMW
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?