Eclectic Properties East, LLC et al v. The Marcus & Millichap Company et al

Filing 336

FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/8/2012. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 E-FILED on 6/8/2012 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 ECLECTIC PROPERTIES EAST, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, et al., No. C-09-00511 RMW 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS 15 16 THE MARCUS & MILLICHAP COMPANY, a California corporation, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 On March 5, 2012, the court granted motions to dismiss brought or joined by all defendants 20 who have appeared in this action. The court finds that there is no just reason for delay and therefore 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of defendants The Marcus & 22 Millichap Company; Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services Inc.; Marcus & Millichap 23 Real Estate Investment Brokerage Company; Sovereign Investment Company; Sovereign Scranton 24 LLC; Sovereign CC, LLC; Sovereign JF, LLC; Paul A. Morabito; Tibarom NY LLC; Tibarom PA 25 LLC; Baruk Management, Inc.; PGP Valuation, Inc.; Glen D. Kunofsky; Marcus Muirhead; Sean 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS—No. C-09-00511 RMW 1 Perkin; Donald Emas; Andrew Lesher; Stewart Weston; Brice Head; Daizy Gomez; and Bret King 2 against plaintiffs, and that plaintiffs take nothing by way of their claims against these parties. 3 4 5 DATED: June 8, 2012 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS—No. C-09-00511 RMW 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?