Eclectic Properties East, LLC et al v. The Marcus & Millichap Company et al

Filing 93

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting 89 motion to shorten time to hear motion for jurisdictional discovery. (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to take jurisdictional discovery relating to defendants Paul Morabito and Baruk Management Inc. (collectively "Morabito defendants") and to shorten time for hearing on the motion. (Docket No. 89). The Morabito defendants oppose the request to shorten time. Having considered the papers submitted by the parties and for good cause appearing, the motion to shorten time is granted. Papers in opposition to the motion for jurisdictional discovery shall be filed and served on or before July 8, 2009. Hearing on the motion shall be on July 10, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. This order does not address the merits of the substantive issues presented by plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery. The court is generally inclined, however, to permit limited and narrowly tailored discovery targeted on personal jurisdiction where doing so will illuminate the facts underlying the issues raised by a motion challenging jurisdiction. While not ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME--No. C-09-0511 RMW TER E-FILED on 7/1/09 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ECLECTIC PROPERTIES EAST, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE MARCUS & MILLICHAP COMPANY, a California corporation, et al., Defendants. No. C-09-0511 RMW ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME [Re Docket No. 89] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 prejudging plaintiffs' motion, the court's initial impression is that the discovery plaintiffs propose does not appear to be sufficiently limited or narrowly tailored. Plaintiffs and the Morabito defendants are hereby ordered to meet and confer further regarding the appropriate scope and timing of such jurisdictional discovery to see if an agreement can be reached. DATED: 7/1/09 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME--No. C-09-0511 RMW TER 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Bonny E. Sweeney James L. Davidson Phong L. Tran Stuart Andrew Davidson bonnys@csgrr.com jdavidson@csgrr.com ptran@csgrr.com sdavidson@csgrr.com Counsel for Defendants The Marcus & Millichap Company, Sovereign Investment Company, Sovereign Scranton LLC, Sovereign CC, LLC, and Sovereign JF, LLC Daniel E. Jackson djackson@kvn.com Daniel Edward Purcell dpurcell@kvn.com Counsel for Defendants Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services Inc., Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Company, Marcus Muirhead, Sean Perkin, Donald Emas, Andrew Lesher, Stewart Weston, Brice Head and Bret King David Charles Scheper dscheper@obsklaw.com Counsel for Defendants Paul A. Morabito and Baruk Management, Inc. Michael John Hassen mjh@jmbm.com Christopher H. Doyle chd@jmbm.com Counsel for Defendants Tibarom NY LLC and Tibarom PA LLC Timothy Alan Horton thorton@mckennalong.com Counsel for Defendant PGP Valuation, Inc. Michael Lloyd Smith mls@mmker.com Counsel for Defendants Glen D. Kunofsky and Daisy Gomez Joshua A. Gratch jag@gratchlawgroup.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: 7/1/09 TER Chambers of Judge Whyte ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME--No. C-09-0511 RMW TER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?