Custodio et al v. The County of Santa Clara, California et al

Filing 9

ORDER re 5 Plaintiff's Motion to Enlarge Time Pursuant to Local Rule 6-3. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 6/11/09. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 6/11/2009)

1 2 3 4 5

Terry Gross ([e-mail]) (103878) Adam C. Belsky ([e-mail]) (147800) Monique Alonso ([e-mail]) (127078) GROSS BELSKY ALONSO LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

) Case No. C09-00527 PVT MARLO CUSTODIO, ROMEL CUSTODIO, MARILOU CUSTODIO, and ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' OSCAR "O.J." CUSTODIO, JR., ) MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME PURSUANT ) TO LOCAL RULE 6-3 Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ) THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, ) CALIFORNIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Plaintiffs filed a motion pursuant to Local Rule 6-3 for an enlargement of the times set in the February 5, 2009 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, due to the fact that the complaint was sent out for service until a few days ago, and thus opposing counsel has been unavailable to meet and confer. Since Fed. R. Civ. P. provides that complaints can be served within 120 days of filing, plaintiffs assert that the complaint has been timely served, but that an enlargement of the times set in the February 5, 2009 Order is required, to enable defendants to retain counsel and have sufficient time to meet and confer on the issues required by the February 5, 2009 Order. The motion is GRANTED. The last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection
1 [Proposed] Order re: Motion to Enlarge Time Pursuant to LR 6-3 Custodio v. State of California, et al., Case No. C09-00527 PVT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

and discovery plan; to file ADR Certification; and to file either Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference is continued from June 2, 2009, to August 4, 2009. The last day to file a Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement is continued from June 16, 2009 to August 18, 2009. The Initial Case Management Conference is continued from June 23, 2009, to August 25, 2009, in Court 5, 4th Floor, SJ at 2:00 pm.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 11, 2009 By: Patricia V. Turnbull Magistrate Judge, United States District Court

2 [Proposed] Order re: Motion to Enlarge Time Pursuant to LR 6-3 Custodio v. State of California, et al., Case No. C09-00527 PVT