Chong's Produce, Inc., v. Ano Samiko, Inc., et al

Filing 24

ORDER CLOSING CASE re 21 Order,. Signed by Judge James Ware on March 25, 2009. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 CHONG'S PRODUCE, INC. v. Plaintiff, NO. CV 09-00659 JW ORDER CLOSING CASE CLERK'S NOTICE RE: FAILURE TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY AND/OR REGISTER AS AN EFILER / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANO SAMIKO, INC., ET AL. Defendant. Pursuant to the Court's Judgment entered on March 18, 2009, the Clerk shall close designated On 2/13/09 , counsel for plaintiff filed a complaint manually, on paper. This case has beenthis file. for electronicItem No. 21.) to Local Rule 5-4 and General Order 45. (See Docket filing, pursuant Dated: March 25, 2009 _____________________________ The above mentioned paper document has been filed and docketed. However, General Order 45 JAMES WARE provides at Section III that cases assigned to judges who participate in the e-filing program "shall be United States District Judge presumptively designated" as e-filing cases. Therefore, counsel for plaintiff should submit the complaint, in PDF format within 10 days, as an attachment in an e-mail message directed to the judges chamber's "PDF" email box listed at http://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. (Click on the Judges button and follow the procedure listed there). Do not e-file a document which has been previously filed on paper, as is the case with the above mentioned filing. All subsequent papers should be e-filed. Further, General Order 45 provides at Section IV (A) that "Each attorney of record is obligated to become an ECF User and be assigned a user ID and password for access to the system upon designation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?