Estate of Gurmit Singh et al v. City of Gilroy et al

Filing 194

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING REQUEST VACATING PRIOR ORDER TO FILE PROPOSED JUDGMENT re 193 Proposed Order. The parties shall file a brief joint statement updating the court on the progress of the settlement by 6/22/2012 unless a request for dismissal has been submitted prior to that date. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/22/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 #65909-3-104 TIMOTHY J. SCHMAL, ESQ. #104874 BURLEIGH E. SABIN, ESQ. #250185 BURTON, SCHMAL & DiBENEDETTO, LLP 133 Mission Street, Suite 102 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Phone : ( 8 31) 4 2 5 - 50 2 3 Facsimile: (831)427-3159 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF GILROY, OFFICER RODRIGUEZ, SERGEANT STANFORD, OFFICER JAQUEZ, OFFICER HEATH 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 ESTATE OF GURMIT SINGH, et al. 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 Case No. C09-00740 EJD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING PRIOR ORDER TO FILE PROPOSED JUDGMENT vs. CITY OF GILROY, et al., 16 Complaint Filed: 2/19/09 Trial Date: 3/12/12 Defendants. [JURY TRIAL DEMANDED] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 As the parties reported to the Court, previously, this matter was mediated with attorney mediator Charles F. Hawkins on Tuesday, May 1. The parties are pleased to report to the Court that the matter has now amicably resolved, but it will take a little bit of time to prepare and submit settlement documents as appropriate. A portion of the settlement fund will be used to purchase an annuity for the minor plaintiffs, the structured settlement company will need to draft settlement documents as appropriate. Plaintiffs' attorneys will then need to petition this Court for approval of the "minors' compromise". The parties therefore respectfully request that the Court STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE; EXT, 1 SETTl,EMENT [C09-00740 EJD] 1 vacate its prior order of May 4 regarding the submittal of proposal 2 judgment(s) by May 25, since this matter will instead be resolved 3 via an order approved minors' compromise and an order dismissing 4 case. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 5 6 Date: CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK May 21, 2012 7 8 /s/ signature on file BY: ANDREW C. SCHWARTZ Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ESTATE OF GURMIT SINGH, et al. 9 10 Date: May 21, 2012 11 12 /s/ signature on file BY: KAREN L. SNELL Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ESTATE OF GURMIT SINGH, et al. 13 14 15 Date: BURTON, SCHMAL & DiBENEDETTO, LLP May 21, 2012 16 17 /s/ signature on file BY: TIMOTHY J. SCHMAL BURLEIGH E. SABIN Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF GILROY,, SERGEANT STANFORD, OFFICER RODRIGUEZ, OFFICER JAQUEZ, and OFFICER HEATH. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Date: 26 ORDER The parties shall file a brief joint statement updating the court on the progress of the settlement by 6/22/2012 unless a request for dismissal has been submitted prior to that date. May 22, 2012 THE HONORABLE EDWARD DAVILA, JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT. 27 28 2 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXT. SETTLEMENT [C09-00740 EJD]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?