Futia v. Panchal et al

Filing 6

ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 5 Stipulation filed by Rick Futia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/31/2009. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION ** E-filed July 31, 2009 ** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RICK FUTIA, v. Plaintiff, No. C09-00921 HRL ORDER OF DISMISSAL [Re: Docket No. 5] United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California NATWARLAL M. PANCHAL, GITA N. PANCHAL, NATWARLAL PANCHAL and GITA PANCHAL, individually and as Trustees, Defendants. ____________________________________/ The parties advise that they have entered a full settlement in the above-entitled action and have stipulated to dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. However, if any party certifies to this court, no later than January 31, 2011, with proof of service of a copy on the other party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered or that the settlement has not been consummated as agreed, the foregoing ORDER SHALL STAND VACATED and this action shall be restored to the calendar and be set for trial. Dated: July 31, 2009 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOWARD R. LLOYD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C 09-00921 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Thomas Nelson Stewart, III t_stew_3@yahoo.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?