Koh v. SC Johnson & Son, Inc

Filing 122

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 121 . The hearing on Plaintiff's motion to compel is CONTINUED to 7/12/2011 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/20/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2011)

4

REESE RICHMAN LLP
Michael R. Reese (Cal. State Bar. No. 206773)
Kim E. Richman
Belinda L. Williams
875 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile
[phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class

6

10

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
Jeffrey Willian, P.C. (Pro Hac Vice)
Robert B. Ellis, P.C. (Pro Hac Vice)
Bradley H. Weidenhammer (Pro Hac Vice)
Nickolas A. Kacprowski (Cal. State Bar. No. 242684)
300 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11

Attorneys for Defendant S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

1
2
3

7
8
9

** E-filed June 20, 2011 **

12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14
15
16

WAYNE KOH, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

vs.
S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC.,

Case No.: 09-cv-00927 RMW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Defendant.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, plaintiff Wayne Koh and defendant SC Johnson & Son, Inc.
(collectively, the “Parties”), by their attorneys, hereby stipulate, contingent upon permission of the
Court, to continue the hearing on plaintiff’s motion to compel production of certain documents over
which SC Johnson asserts privilege (Docket No. 93), from June 21, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. to July 12,

28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing
Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel

Case No. 09-cv-00927 RMW

1
2
3
4

2011 at 10:00 a.m. At this time, the parties believe it is in the interests of efficiency and judicial
economy to work further toward settlement, which would obviate the need for such hearing.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
DATED:

June 17, 2011
REESE RICHMAN LLP

5
6

/s/ Michael R. Reese
Michael R. Reese
875 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor
New York, New York 10001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8
9
10

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

11
/s/ Bradley H. Weidenhammer
Nickolas A. Kacprowski, Bar No. 242684
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

12
13
14
15

Jeffrey L. Willian, P.C. (Pro Hac Vice)
Robert B. Ellis, P.C. (Pro Hac Vice)
Bradley H. Weidenhammer (Pro Hac Vice)
300 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 20, 2011
DATED: ____________________

24

________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
HOWARD R. LLOYD
United States Magistrate Judge

25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing
Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel

-2-

Case No. 09-cv-00927 RMW

1
2
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL on
this day, June 17, 2011, to be served upon the following counsel by way of the CM/ECF electronic
filing system.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

REESE RICHMAN LLP
Michael R. Reese
Kim E. Richman
875 Avenue of the Americas, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10001
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
WHATLEY DRAKE & KALLAS LLC
Deborah Clark-Weintraub
1540 Broadway, 37th Floor
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated: June 17, 2011

16
17
18
19

/s/ Bradley H. Weidenhammer
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
Nickolas A. Kacprowski, Bar No. 242684
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 91404
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Jeffrey L. Willian, P.C.
Robert B. Ellis, P.C.
Bradley H. Weidenhammer
Amy E. Crawford
300 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Counsel for SC Johnson & Son, Inc.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing
Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel

-3-

Case No. 09-cv-00927 RMW