Montes v. Rafalowski et al
Filing
43
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL, Attorney Peter A. Detre,Carolyn Veronica Zabrycki for Roy A. Montes added. Case Management Conference set for 7/8/2011 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/3/11. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2011)
1
2
*E-FILED - 6/3/11*
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
ROY A. MONTES,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
14
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER P.
RAFALOWSKI and
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER J.
CLEMONS,
15
Defendants.
) No. C 09-0976 RMW (PR)
)
) ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff being in need of counsel to assist him in this matter, and volunteer attorneys
willing to be appointed to represent plaintiff having been located by the court,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Peter A. Detre, Carolyn V. Zabrycki, and Aaron G.
20
Leiderman of the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, are appointed as counsel for plaintiff in
21
this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and the court’s Federal Pro Bono Project
22
guidelines.
23
A status conference is set in this matter for July 8, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. to set pretrial and
24
trial dates. The parties are instructed to file a Joint Status Conference Statement, pursuant to
25
Civil L.R. 16-9, seven days prior to the conference. The stay of this matter shall remain in
26
effect until four weeks from the date this order is filed.
27
28
The clerk shall serve newly appointed counsel, as well as the parties, with a copy of this
order, and shall update the docket sheet in this matter to reflect plaintiff’s new counsel.
Order Appointing Counsel
P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.09\Montes976apptatty.wpd
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6/3/11
DATED: _________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Appointing Counsel
P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.09\Montes976apptatty.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?