Martinez et al v. Antique & Salvage Liquidators, Inc.

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 Stipulation for Leave to File the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/12/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233 ADAM PEDERSEN, Bar No. 261091 LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG 12 S First Street, Suite 708 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: 408-292-1040 Fax: 408-416-0268 adamqwang@gmail.com ** E-Filed March 12, 2010 ** Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARTINEZ, ET, AL., Plaintiffs, vs. ANTIQUE & SALVAGE LIQUIDATORS, ET.AL., Defendants. Case No.: C09-00997-HRL STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Parties to the above-entitled case, through their respective counsel, submit the following stipulation: 1. Subsequent to Plaintiffs filing a motion for leave file the First Amended Complaint, parties to stipulated for such amendment, and requested a modification of the scheduling order (Docket No. 23). 2. Pursuant to parties stipulation, on February 11, 2010, the Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file the First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 24). 3. On February 11, 2010, Plaintiffs filed the First Amended Complaint, adding additional defendants, and adding a cause of action under California Labor Code Private Attorney General's Act, § 2698, et seq. ("PAGA"), seeking to recover unpaid overtime for violation of Labor Code § 510. STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Martinez, et al v. Antique & Assets Liquidators, Inc., et al. Case No. C09-00997 HRL 1 Plaintiffs shall file their Second Amended Complaint as a separate docket entry within three days of this order. March 12

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?