Miyata et al v. California in Nice, Inc.
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 43 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 4/29/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)
1
2
3
4
Richard G. Grotch, Esq. - SBN 127713
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH
A Professional Corporation, Lawyers
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300
Redwood City, California 94065-2133
Tel. (650) 592-5400
Fax.(650) 592-5027
E-mail: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com
5
6
ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant
CALIFORNIA IN NICE, INC., d/b/a NICE AIR
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFOERNIA
10
(San Jose Branch)
11
12
HARUKO MIYATA, Individually, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
CALIFORNIA IN NICE, INC., (d.b.a. NICE
AIR), et al.,
Defendants.
/
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, through their
18
20
respective attorneys of record, that this entire action be, and hereby is dismissed with prejudice
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO STIPULATED.
21
22
-----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
vs.
16
19
No. C 09-1148 JF (HRL)
Dated: March 30, 2011
MARSHALL SUZUKI LAW GROUP,
LLP
23
/s/ Junji Suzuki
24
By:
25
Junji Suzuki
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Haruko Miyata, et al.
26
27
28
///
///
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
1
Dated: April 14, 2011
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH
2
/s/ Richard G. Grotch
3
By:
4
Richard G. Grotch (*)
Attorneys for Defendant
California In Nice, Inc.
5
6
7
(*) I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures
for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/)
within this e-filed document.
8
9
ORDER
10
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
29
Dated: April ___, 2011
13
_________________________________________
Honorable Jeremy Fogel
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CODDINGTON, HICKS
& DANFORTH
A Professional Corp., Lawyers
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300
Redwood City, CA 94065
(650) 592-5400
2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?