Merritt et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
Filing
197
ORDER SUBMITTING 159 MOTION TO STAY STATE LAW CLAIMS WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT AND VACATING HEARING; CLARIFYING COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER, re 193 , 195 . Plaintiffs are reminded that all filings must be signed by both plaintiffs. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 2/12/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2015) Modified on 2/12/2015 (blflc2, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
DAVID MERRITT, et al.,
7
Case No. 09-cv-01179-BLF
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL
CORPORATION, et al.,
10
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ORDER SUBMITTING MOTION
WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT AND
VACATING HEARING; CLARIFYING
COURT’S SCHEDULING ORDER
[Re: ECF 159, 193]
12
The Motion to Stay State Law Claims, ECF 159, that was noticed for hearing on February
13
14
19, 2015 is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument; the hearing is VACATED.1 See Civ.
15
L.R. 7-1(b).
In response to Plaintiffs’ “Request for Correction/Amendment of Court’s January 30, 2015
16
17
Order,” ECF 193, the Court interprets defendant Angelo Mozilo’s joinder, ECF 181, of the
18
Countrywide Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss as just that—he joins those motions as a moving
19
party. Plaintiffs therefore need not separately respond to Mr. Mozilo’s joinder notice.
Plaintiffs are reminded that all filings must be signed by both plaintiffs. If Mrs. Salma
20
21
Merritt fails to sign future filings, she will not be considered a party to the filing and risks having
22
her claims dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: February 12, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
Defendants’ motion to continue the hearing date, ECF 194, is DENIED as moot.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?