Merritt et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al

Filing 210

ORDER STRIKING 205 OVERSIZE BRIEF; DENYING 208 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 4/1/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 DAVID MERRITT, et al., Case No. 09-cv-01179-BLF Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, et al., ORDER STRIKING OVERSIZE BRIEF; DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES [Re: ECF 205, 208] Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Countrywide and Bank of America Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) 14 Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint, ECF 205, is grossly in excess of the maximum 15 pages allowed for an opposition brief or memorandum, as set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-3(a). It 16 is accordingly STRICKEN. Plaintiffs shall file a brief that conforms with the requirements of the 17 local rules by no later than April 9, 2015. Defendants’ reply shall be due within 7 days 18 thereafter. Civ. L.R. 7-3(c). Defendants’ Motion to Exceed the Page Limit on Defendants’ Reply, 19 ECF 208, is accordingly DENIED as moot. 20 All parties are reminded that evidentiary objections must be contained within the text of 21 the brief or memorandum, Civ. L.R. 7-3; all papers must be double-spaced with no more than 28 22 lines per page, Civ. L.R. 3-4(c)(2); and all typewritten font (including footnotes) must be no 23 smaller than 12-point font, id. It goes without saying that these exemplary requirements are not 24 exhaustive, and the parties should familiarize themselves with all of the Civil Local Rules. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2015 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?