Synthes (USA) v. Spinal Kinetics Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER 35 Approving Substitution of Counsel for Spinal Kinetics, Inc., Attorney James W. Geriak for Spinal Kinetics Inc., Robert W. Dickerson for Spinal Kinetics Inc., Allan William Jansen for Spinal Kinetics Inc. added. Attorney Adam Wyatt Poff & Josy W. Ingersoll terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/10/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2009) Modified on 4/22/2009 (sp, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James W. Geriak (State Bar No. 32871) jgeriak@orrick.com Robert W. Dickerson (State Bar No. 89367) rdickerson@orrick.com Allan W. Jansen (State Bar No. 81992) ajansen@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 4 Park Plaza, Suite 1600 Irvine, CA 92614-2558 Telephone: (949) 567-6700 Facsimile: (949) 567-6710 Attorneys for Defendant SPINAL KINETICS, INC. *E-FILED - 4/10/09* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SYNTHES USA, LLC (f/k/a SYNTHES (U.S.A.)); SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC; and SYNTHES, INC., Plaintiffs, v. SPINAL KINETICS, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. 5:09-CV-01201 RMW [] ORDER APPROVING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR SPINAL KINETICS, INC. OHS West:260632209.1 SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL (CASE NO. 5:09-CV-01201 RMW) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court hereby GRANTS defendant Spinal Kinetics, Inc.'s request to substitute James W. Geriak, Robert W. Dickerson, and Allan W. Jansen all of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP ("Orrick") as counsel of record for in this action place and stead of Josy W. Ingersoll and Adam W. Poff of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP. The Clerk is instructed to correct the Court's records to reflect this substitution. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 4/10 , 2009 RONALD M. WHYTE U.S. District Judge OHS West:260632209.1 -1- SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL (CASE NO. 5:09-CV-01201 RMW)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?