Synthes (USA) v. Spinal Kinetics Inc.
Filing
454
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte granting 426 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2011)
Case5:09-cv-01201-RMW Document426-1
Filed11/09/11 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
SYNTHES USA, LLC (f/k/a SYNTHES
(U.S.A.)),
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
SPINAL KINETICS, INC.,
Defendant.
17
18
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
CASE NO. 5:09-CV-01201 RMW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SPINAL KINETICS, INC.’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL: (1) SPINAL KINETICS’
SUBMISSION RE: NONINFRINGEMENT POSITIONS THAT
SYNTHES WAS ON NOTICE DURING
FACT AND EXPERT DISCOVERY
PERIODS; AND (2) CERTAIN EXHIBITS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF
Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Case5:09-cv-01201-RMW Document426-1
1
Filed11/09/11 Page2 of 2
The Court, having considered Spinal Kinetics, Inc.’s Administrative Motion To File
2
Under Seal: (1) Spinal Kinetics’ Submission re: Non-infringement Positions that Synthes was on
3
Notice of During the Fact and Expert Discovery Periods (“Submission”) and (2) Certain Exhibits
4
in support thereof as well as the Declaration of Ehab M. Samuel in support of the Administrative
5
Motion, finds that good cause exists pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5 and hereby orders that the
6
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal is GRANTED in its entirety.
7
The clerk shall maintain under Seal the Confidential Version of (1) Spinal Kinetics’
8
Submission re: Non-infringement Positions that Synthes was on Notice of During the Fact and
9
Expert Discovery Periods; and (2) Exhibits B, I, J, L, M, N, and Q in support.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: November 23
, 2011
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?