Synthes (USA) v. Spinal Kinetics Inc.

Filing 523

STIPULATION AND ORDER 514 to Continue Hearing on Spinal Kinetics, Inc.'s Motion to Have Case Declared Exceptional and for Award of Attorneys' Fees, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 513 MOTION. Motion Hearing set for 5/4/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/23/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 James W. Geriak (State Bar No. 32871) geriakj@dicksteinshapiro.com Allan W. Jansen (State Bar No. 81992) jansena@dicksteinshapiro.com Ehab M. Samuel (State Bar No. 228296) samuele@dicksteinshapiro.com Mark Stirrat (State Bar No. 229448) stirratm@dicksteinshapiro.com DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 2 Park Plaza, Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92614-8561 Telephone: (949) 623-7880 Facsimile: (949) 623-7881 Robert W. Dickerson (State Bar No. 89367) dickersonr@dicksteinshapiro.com DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 772-8300 Facsimile: (310) 772-8317 Attorneys for Defendant SPINAL KINETICS, INC. Jeffrey M. Olson (State Bar No. 104074) jolson@sidley.com Paul H. Meier (State Bar No. 115999) pmeier@sidley.com Samuel N. Tiu (State Bar No. 216291) stiu@sidley.com Matthew S. Jorgenson (State Bar No. 229131) mjorgenson@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 W. Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNTHES USA, LLC (f/k/a SYNTHES (U.S.A.)) 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN JOSE DIVISION 21 22 SYNTHES USA, LLC (f/k/a SYNTHES (U.S.A.)), 23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 SPINAL KINETICS, INC., STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON SPINAL KINETICS, INC.’S MOTION TO HAVE CASE DECLARED EXCEPTIONAL AND FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES (DKT. #513) Defendant. 26 27 CASE NO. 5:09-CV-01201 RMW AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 28 DOCSLA-91640v1 STIPULATION AND [ ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING RE MOTION TO HAVE CASE DECLARED EXCEPTIONAL 1 On March 19, 2012, Spinal Kinetics, Inc. (“Spinal Kinetics”) filed its Motion to Have Case 2 Declared Exceptional and for Award of Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion”). (Dkt. #513). The hearing on 3 the Motion is presently set for April 27, 2012. 4 5 Counsel for Synthes USA, LLC (f/k/a Synthes (U.S.A.)) (“Synthes”) has requested a continuance of the Motion hearing date and counsel for Spinal Kinetics has agreed. 6 Counsel and the Court are available on May 4, 2012 for the hearing on the Motion. 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their undersigned 8 counsel of record, and subject to the approval of this Court, that: 9 1. 10 a.m.; and 11 2. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. The date for the Motion hearing is continued from April 27, 2012 to May 4, 2012 at 9 The Clerk shall update the Court’s Docket and Calendar accordingly. 13 14 Dated: , 2012 HON. RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 15 16 17 Agreed to and submitted by: 18 Dated: March 28, 2012 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP By: 19 20 21 22 Dated: March 28, 2012 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP By: 23 24 25 /s/ James W. Geriak James W. Geriak Attorneys for Defendant SPINAL KINETICS, INC. /s/ Jeffrey M. Olson Jeffrey M. Olson Attorneys for Plaintiff SYNTHES USA, LLC (f/k/a SYNTHES (U.S.A.)) 26 27 28 DOCSLA-91640v1 1 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING RE MOTION TO HAVE CASE DECLARED EXCEPTIONAL 1 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), I attest under penalty of perjury that 2 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jeffrey M. Olson, counsel of 3 record for Synthes USA, LLC (f/k/a Synthes (U.S.A.)). 4 5 6 Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 28, 2012 7 DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP By: 8 9 /s/ James W. Geriak James W. Geriak Attorneys for Defendant SPINAL KINETICS, INC. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DOCSLA-91640v1 2 STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING RE MOTION TO HAVE CASE DECLARED EXCEPTIONAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?