C&C Jewelry Mfg Inc v. Trent West

Filing 187

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL re 180 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/8/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825) ddurie@durietangri.com RYAN M. KENT (SBN 220441) rkent@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SCHEEF & STONE, LLP JOHN G. FISCHER (pro hac vice) john.fischer@solidcounsel.com BRYAN HAYNES (pro hac vice) bhaynes@solidcounsel.com ERIC C. WOOD (pro hac vice) eric.wood@solidcounsel.com 500 N. Akard, Suite 2700 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: 214-706-4200 Facsimile: 214-706-4242 Attorneys for Plaintiff C&C Jewelry Manufacturing, Inc. Edward Vincent King, Jr. (SBN 085726) KING & KELLEHER, LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 781-2888 Facsimile: (415) 781-3011 Attorneys for Defendant Trent West 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 20 21 C&C JEWELRY MANUFACTURING, 22 INC., a California corporation, 25 26 27 JOINT STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff and CounterDefendant, 23 24 Case No. 5:09-cv-01303-JF-HRL Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel v. TRENT WEST, Defendant and CounterClaimant. 28 -1STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 5:09-CV-01303-JF-HRL 1 Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P., Rules 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiff and Counter- 2 Defendant C&C Jewelry Mfg. Co, Inc. (“C&C”), and Defendant and Counter-Claimant Trent 3 West (“West”) hereby jointly file this Stipulation of Partial Dismissal Without Prejudice as 4 follows: 5 6 I. C&C hereby dismisses, without prejudice, Count VII (Non-Infringement, Invalidity, and 7 Unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 7,076,972) set forth in its original Complaint for Declaratory 8 Judgment (Doc. No. 1). 9 10 11 II. West hereby dismisses, without prejudice, its First Counterclaim (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,076,972) set forth in its original Answer and Counterclaims (Doc. No. 6). 12 III. 13 West stipulates to C&C’s dismissal without prejudice of its Count VII (Non- 14 Infringement, Invalidity, and Unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 7,076,972). C&C stipulates to 15 West’s dismissal without prejudice of its First Counterclaim (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 16 7,076,972). 17 18 19 IV. Each of the parties agrees to bear its respective fees and costs in this action with regard to the claims dismissed herein. 20 21 Respectfully stipulated to by: 22 SCHEEF & STONE, LLP KING & KELLEHER, LLP By: /s/ John G. Fischer John G. Fischer By: /s/ Edward Vincent King Edward Vincent King Attorneys for Plaintiff C&C Jewelry Mfg., Inc. Attorneys for Defendant Trent West Date: May 19, 2011 Date: May 19, 2011 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 5:09-CV-01303-JF-HRL 1 2 3 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, John Fischer, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 4 5 6 7 8 9 SCHEEF & STONE, LLP By: /s/ John G. Fischer John G. Fischer Attorneys for Plaintiff C&C Jewelry Mfg., Inc. 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. June 8 DATED: ----- _____, 2011. May 13 14 15 16 Hon. Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Case No. 5:09-CV-01303-JF-HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?