C&C Jewelry Mfg Inc v. Trent West
Filing
187
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL re 180 . Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 6/8/11. (dlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2011)
1
2
3
4
DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825)
ddurie@durietangri.com
RYAN M. KENT (SBN 220441)
rkent@durietangri.com
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415-362-6666
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SCHEEF & STONE, LLP
JOHN G. FISCHER (pro hac vice)
john.fischer@solidcounsel.com
BRYAN HAYNES (pro hac vice)
bhaynes@solidcounsel.com
ERIC C. WOOD (pro hac vice)
eric.wood@solidcounsel.com
500 N. Akard, Suite 2700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone:
214-706-4200
Facsimile:
214-706-4242
Attorneys for Plaintiff
C&C Jewelry Manufacturing, Inc.
Edward Vincent King, Jr. (SBN 085726)
KING & KELLEHER, LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 781-2888
Facsimile: (415) 781-3011
Attorneys for Defendant Trent West
18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
19
20
21 C&C JEWELRY MANUFACTURING,
22 INC., a California corporation,
25
26
27
JOINT STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED]
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiff and CounterDefendant,
23
24
Case No. 5:09-cv-01303-JF-HRL
Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel
v.
TRENT WEST,
Defendant and CounterClaimant.
28
-1STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No. 5:09-CV-01303-JF-HRL
1
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P., Rules 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiff and Counter-
2
Defendant C&C Jewelry Mfg. Co, Inc. (“C&C”), and Defendant and Counter-Claimant Trent
3
West (“West”) hereby jointly file this Stipulation of Partial Dismissal Without Prejudice as
4
follows:
5
6
I.
C&C hereby dismisses, without prejudice, Count VII (Non-Infringement, Invalidity, and
7
Unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 7,076,972) set forth in its original Complaint for Declaratory
8
Judgment (Doc. No. 1).
9
10
11
II.
West hereby dismisses, without prejudice, its First Counterclaim (Infringement of U.S.
Patent No. 7,076,972) set forth in its original Answer and Counterclaims (Doc. No. 6).
12
III.
13
West stipulates to C&C’s dismissal without prejudice of its Count VII (Non-
14
Infringement, Invalidity, and Unenforceability of U.S. Patent No. 7,076,972). C&C stipulates to
15
West’s dismissal without prejudice of its First Counterclaim (Infringement of U.S. Patent No.
16
7,076,972).
17
18
19
IV.
Each of the parties agrees to bear its respective fees and costs in this action with regard to
the claims dismissed herein.
20
21
Respectfully stipulated to by:
22
SCHEEF & STONE, LLP
KING & KELLEHER, LLP
By: /s/ John G. Fischer
John G. Fischer
By: /s/ Edward Vincent King
Edward Vincent King
Attorneys for Plaintiff C&C Jewelry Mfg.,
Inc.
Attorneys for Defendant Trent
West
Date: May 19, 2011
Date: May 19, 2011
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No. 5:09-CV-01303-JF-HRL
1
2
3
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, John Fischer,
attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
4
5
6
7
8
9
SCHEEF & STONE, LLP
By: /s/ John G. Fischer
John G. Fischer
Attorneys for Plaintiff C&C Jewelry Mfg.,
Inc.
10
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
June 8
DATED: ----- _____, 2011.
May
13
14
15
16
Hon. Jeremy Fogel
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Case No. 5:09-CV-01303-JF-HRL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?