C&C Jewelry Mfg Inc v. Trent West
Filing
245
ORDER VACATING 243 ORDER OF DISMISSAL, AND DIRECTING THAT CASE BE REOPENED AND REASSIGNED TO JUDGE EDWARD DAVILA (addressing 244 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/28/2011. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
1
**E-Filed 11/28/2011**
2
3
4
5
6
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
United States District Court
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
C&C JEWELRY MANUFACTURING, INC.,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
17
TRENT WEST,
Case No. 5:09-cv-01303-JF
ORDER VACATING ORDER OF
DISMISSAL, AND DIRECTING THAT CASE
BE REOPENED AND REASSIGNED TO
JUDGE EDWARD DAVILA
Defendant.
[re: dkt. entry 244]
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
18
19
20
On July 28, 2011, the Court dismissed this action after being informed that the parties had
21
reached a settlement. The dismissal order provided that “if any party notifies the Court within
22
ninety days of the date of this order that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been
23
delivered, this order will be vacated and the case will be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.”
24
On October 25, 2011, Defendant-Counterclaimant Trent West filed a notice that the agreed upon
25
consideration had not been delivered, and he requested that the Court vacate the order of dismissal.
26
Good cause therefor appearing, the order of dismissal (dkt entry 243) is hereby VACATED.
27
The Clerk shall reopen the case and reassign it to District Judge Edward Davila, the judge assigned
28
to the related cases 5:07-cv-01812-EJD and 5:10-cv-03124-EJD.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
DATED: 11/28/2011
__________________________________
JEREMY FOGEL
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?