General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. The Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities 2006-AR18 Trust et al

Filing 418

ORDER Granting 417 Request for Leave To File Additional Statement of Recent Decision. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 10, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)

Download PDF
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION     13 14 IN RE WELLS FARGO MORTGAGEBACKED CERTIFICATES LITIGATION   15   16   17 Civil Action No. 09-cv-01376-LHK (PSG)   CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION ECF   ORDER GRANTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION       Judge: Courtroom: 18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28     ORDER Case No. 09-cv-01376-LHK (PSG) Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal 5, 4th Floor 1 ORDER   2 This matter is before the Court upon the request of Lead Plaintiffs Alameda County 3 Employees’ Retirement Association, Government of Guam Retirement Fund, New Orleans 4 Employees’ Retirement System and Louisiana Sheriffs’ Pension and Relief Fund (collectively, “Lead 5 Plaintiffs”) for leave to file the Additional Statement of Recent Decision in connection with the 6 Motion to Compel filed by Wells Fargo Defendants [ECF No. 343] and Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion for 7 Protective Order and to Quash Subpoenas [ECF No. 336];             8 Having considered the Request, and for good cause appearing, Lead Plaintiffs’ request for   9 leave to file is GRANTED. Lead Plaintiffs’ Additional Statement of Recent Decision, which is   10 attached as Exhibit A to the Request, and Exhibit B thereto, are deemed filed. Defendants may file a 11 response, not to exceed five pages, to this statement no later than May 17, 2011. 12 DATED: May 10, 2011     THE HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28     -1ORDER Case No. 09-cv-01376-LHK (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?