Hogg v. Curry

Filing 7

ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 6 Motion for Extension of Time for Petitioner to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Order Granting Extension of Time for Petitioner to File Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.09\Hogg.380.EOT-Opp2MTD.wpd

*E-FILED - 8/7/09*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES E. HOGG, Petitioner, v. BEN CURRY, Warden, Respondent. /

No. C 09-01380 RMW (PR) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PETITIONER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Petitioner, a state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court directed respondent to file an answer to the petition and granted petitioner leave to file a traverse within thirty days after the answer was filed. In lieu of filing an answer, respondent has filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS petitioner an extension of time in which to file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss. The time in which petitioner may file his opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss will be extended up to and including thirty (30) days from the date this order is signed. Respondent shall file a reply brief no later than fifteen (15) days after the date petitioner's opposition is filed.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This order terminates docket no. 6. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED:

8/5/09

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

Order Granting Extension of Time for Petitioner to File Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.09\Hogg.380.EOT-Opp2MTD.wpd

2