Fiori et al v. Dell, Inc, et al

Filing 66

STIPULATION AND ORDER AS MOOT EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS re 62 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/21/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

S ean P . D e B ru i n e (S B N 1 6 8 0 7 1 ) C . A u g u s t i n e R a k o w ( S BN 2 5 4 5 9 5 ) AL S T O N & B I R D L L P T w o P al o A l t o S q u a r e 3 0 0 0 E l C am i n o R e al , S t e 4 0 0 P al o A l t o , C A 9 4 3 0 6 -2 1 1 2 P h o n e: ( 6 5 0 ) 8 3 8 -2 0 0 0 F ax : (6 5 0 ) 8 3 8 -2 0 0 1 s ea n . d eb ru i n e@ al s t o n . c o m [e-mail] Kristine M. Brown (applying pro hac vice) Matthew D. Richardson (appl ying pro hac vice) AL S T O N & B I R D L L P O n e A t l an t i c C en t er 1 2 0 1 W es t P ea ch t re e S t r eet A t l an t a, G A 3 0 3 0 9 -3 4 2 4 P h o n e: 4 0 4 -8 8 1 -7 0 0 0 F ax : 4 0 4 - 8 8 1 -7 7 7 7 krist [e-mail] m at t . ri c h a rd s o n @ al s t o n . co m Paul Schlaud (appl ying pro hac vice) Sinead O'Carroll (appl ying pro hac vice) R E E V E S & B R I GH T W E L L 2 2 1 W es t S i x t h S t r eet , S t e 1 0 0 0 Au s t i n , T X 7 8 7 0 1 -3 4 1 0 P h o n e: 5 1 2 . 3 3 4 . 4 5 0 4 F ax : 5 1 2 . 3 3 4 . 4 4 9 2 [e-mail] s o c ar ro l l @ r ee v es b ri g h t w el l . co m Attorneys for Defendants DELL, INC. et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION VIVIAN FIORI, and ROGGIE TRUJILLO, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DELL INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. 5:09-CV-01518 JW
FIEDINGIAS MOOT DEFENDANREQUEST FOR P N RM TTING DEFENDANTS TS TO FILE EXTENSION OF TIMETO FILE REPLY BREIFS IN REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MOTIONS TO DISMISS ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2009.

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY ISO MOT TO DISMISS

1

Case No. 5:09-CV-01518 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to Civ. L. R. 6-2 the parties, by their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate, subject to court approval, that Defendants may file and serve their Reply briefs in support of their Motions to Dismiss on September 8, 2009 and in support of this stipulation state as follows: The hearing on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss is currently set on September 21, 2009. Under the Court's Civil Local Rules Defendants' Reply brief in support of that motion would normally be due September 7, 2009, which is 14 days before the hearing. However, September 7 is the Labor Day holiday. The parties therefore agree, subject to the Court's approval, that Defendants' Reply may be filed on September 8, 2009. The Court order rescheduling the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss from September 14, 2009 to September 21, 2009 is the only previous modification of time in this case, and this modification will have no effect on the schedule in this matter, which has not yet been adopted. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: September 3, 2009 ALSTON + BIRD LLP

By:

/s/ Sean P. DeBruine Sean P. DeBruine

Attorneys for Defendants DELL, INC. et al.

Dated: September 3, 2009

STRANGE & CARPENTER

By:

/s/ Gretchen Carpenter Gretchen Carpenter

Attorneys for Plaintiffs VIVIAN FIORI, and ROGGIE TRUJILLO

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED:
The Court finds the stipulation is MOOT. The reply briefs were filed as stipulated by the parties on September 8, 2009

September 21 Dated: ___________, 2009

Hon. James Ware U.S. District Court Judge 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY ISO MOT TO DISMISS

Case No. 5:09-CV-01518 JW

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY ISO MOT TO DISMISS #31493990

FILER'S ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Sean P. DeBruine, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Gretchen Carpenter.

/s/ Sean P. DeBruine Sean P. DeBruine

3

Case No. 5:09-CV-01518 JW