Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 177

Proposed Order Granting Apple Inc.'s Unopposed Motion For Leave To Amend Invalidity Contentions by Apple, Inc.. (Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 10/18/2010)

Download PDF
Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 177 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION CINDY COHN (145997) cindy@eff.org LEE TIEN (148216) tien@eff.org KURT OPSAHL (191303) kurt@eff.org KEVIN S. BANKSTON (217026) bankston@eff.org CORYNNE MCSHERRY (221504) corynne@eff.org JAMES S. TYRE (083117) jstyre@eff.org 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: 415/436-9333 415/436-9993 (fax) Attorneys for Plaintiffs [Additional counsel appear on signature page.] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, CAROLYN JEWEL and ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. AT&T CORP., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C-06-0672-VRW CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AT&T CORP.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT 86) Courtroom: Judge: 6, 17th Floor Hon. Vaughn Walker No. C-06-0672-VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AT&T CORP. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On April 28, 2006, Defendant AT&T Corp. moved (Dkt 86) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Dkt 8) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Defendant AT&T Inc. joined in this motion. On June 23, 2006, the motion duly came on for hearing, the Hon. Vaughn R. Walker, United States District Chief Judge, presiding. Having considered AT&T Corp.'s moving and reply papers, Plaintiffs' opposition papers and the oral arguments by counsel, and good cause appearing, Defendants' motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED. Date: _________________ Hon. Vaughn R. Walker United States District Chief Judge No. C-06-0672-VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING AT&T CORP. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED COMPLAINT -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C-06-0672-VRW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 6, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I have mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the following nonCM/ECF participants: David W. Carpenter Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP Bank One Plaza 10 South Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60600 David L. Lawson Sidley Austin Brown & Wood 172 Eye Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 By /s/ Cindy A. Cohn, Esq. (SBN.145997) ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 x108 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 cindy@eff.org PROOF OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?