Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
234
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal [APPLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO ELAN'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF US PATENT NO. 5,825,352 AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS] filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 6/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)
matthew.powers@weil.com
JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)
jared.bobrow@weil.com
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
sonal.mehta@weil.com
DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)
nathan.greenblatt@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
Apple Inc.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
15
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
16
17
18
19
v.
APPLE INC.,
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
APPLE INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORP.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.
20
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
The Court has received Apple Inc.’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
2
Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Elan Microelectronics Corp.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,
3
and the Greenblatt Declaration in support of the same. Good cause appearing, Apple’s motion is
4
hereby GRANTED. The following may be filed under seal:
5
1.
Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Elan Microelectronics Corp.’s Motion for Partial
6
Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,825,352 (“Apple’s Opposition”) (a
7
partially redacted public version is being lodged with the Court).
8
9
2.
The Declaration of Ravin Balakrishnan in Support of Apple’s Opposition (a
partially redacted public version is being lodged with the Court).
10
3.
Exhibit A [May 24, 2011 Dezmelyk Dep.] to the Walter Declaration.
11
4.
Exhibit D [May 24, 2011 Dezmelyk Dep., Exh. 13] to the Walter Declaration (a
12
13
14
15
16
17
partially redacted public version is being lodged with the Court).
5.
Exhibit G [Aug. 27, 2006 letter from Elantech Devices Corp. to Apple Inc.] to the
Walter Declaration.
6.
Exhibit H [Aug. 22, 2007 letter from J. Whitt to S. DeBruine] to the Walter
Declaration.
7.
Exhibit L [Nov. 11, 2010 Westerman Dep.] to the Walter Declaration.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
Dated: _____________, 2011
_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?