Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 234

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal [APPLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO ELAN'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF US PATENT NO. 5,825,352 AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS] filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 6/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795) matthew.powers@weil.com JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712) jared.bobrow@weil.com SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086) sonal.mehta@weil.com DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322) derek.walter@weil.com NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279) nathan.greenblatt@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Apple Inc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, 15 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, 16 17 18 19 v. APPLE INC., Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL APPLE INC.’S OPPOSITION TO ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORP.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 20 JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG) 1 The Court has received Apple Inc.’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal 2 Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Elan Microelectronics Corp.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, 3 and the Greenblatt Declaration in support of the same. Good cause appearing, Apple’s motion is 4 hereby GRANTED. The following may be filed under seal: 5 1. Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Elan Microelectronics Corp.’s Motion for Partial 6 Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,825,352 (“Apple’s Opposition”) (a 7 partially redacted public version is being lodged with the Court). 8 9 2. The Declaration of Ravin Balakrishnan in Support of Apple’s Opposition (a partially redacted public version is being lodged with the Court). 10 3. Exhibit A [May 24, 2011 Dezmelyk Dep.] to the Walter Declaration. 11 4. Exhibit D [May 24, 2011 Dezmelyk Dep., Exh. 13] to the Walter Declaration (a 12 13 14 15 16 17 partially redacted public version is being lodged with the Court). 5. Exhibit G [Aug. 27, 2006 letter from Elantech Devices Corp. to Apple Inc.] to the Walter Declaration. 6. Exhibit H [Aug. 22, 2007 letter from J. Whitt to S. DeBruine] to the Walter Declaration. 7. Exhibit L [Nov. 11, 2010 Westerman Dep.] to the Walter Declaration. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 22 Dated: _____________, 2011 _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 1 Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?