Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
235
Declaration of Nathan Greenblatt in Support of 234 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal [APPLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO ELAN'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF US PATENT NO. 5,825,352 AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS] Administrative Motion to File Under Seal [APPLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO ELAN'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF US PATENT NO. 5,825,352 AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS] filed byApple, Inc.. (Related document(s) 234 ) (Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 6/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)
matthew.powers@weil.com
JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)
jared.bobrow@weil.com
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
sonal.mehta@weil.com
DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)
nathan.greenblatt@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
9
10
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
Apple Inc.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
15
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
16
17
18
19
v.
APPLE INC.,
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
DECLARATION OF NATHAN
GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE APPLE INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORP.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER
SEAL
Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.
20
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT
OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
I, Nathan Greenblatt, declare:
2
I am an attorney with the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, counsel of
3
record for Defendant and Counter-Claimant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in the above-captioned matter.
4
I submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation.
5
If called upon as a witness, I could competently testify to the truth of each statement herein.
6
1.
I prepared the redacted version of Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Elan
7
Microelectronics Corp.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent
8
No. 5,825,352 (“Apple’s Opposition”). Based on my review, the redacted portions contain
9
confidential technical information regarding the operation of Apple’s products, as well as internal
10
11
codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
2.
I prepared the redacted version of the Declaration of Ravin Balakrishnan in
12
Support of Apple’s Opposition. Based on my review, the redacted portions contain confidential
13
technical information regarding the operation of Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames,
14
which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
15
3.
I have reviewed Exhibit A [May 24, 2011 Dezmelyk Dep.] to the Walter
16
Declaration. Based on my review, the exhibit consists predominantly of technical information
17
related to the operation of Apple products, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
18
4.
I prepared the redacted version of Exhibit D [May 24, 2011 Dezmelyk Dep., Exh.
19
13] to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the redacted portions consists of technical
20
information related to the operation of Apple products, which could harm Apple if publicly
21
disclosed.
22
5.
I have reviewed Exhibit G [Aug. 27, 2006 letter from Elantech Devices Corp. to
23
Apple Inc.] to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, exhibit consists of confidential
24
correspondence between Apple and Elan that could have an adverse impact on Apple if publicly
25
disclosed.
26
6.
I have reviewed Exhibit H [Aug. 22, 2007 letter from J. Whitt to S. DeBruine] to
27
the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, exhibit consists of confidential correspondence
28
between Apple and Elan that could have an adverse impact on Apple if publicly disclosed.
DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT
OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
7.
I have reviewed Exhibit L [Nov. 11, 2010 Westerman Dep.] to the Walter
2
Declaration. Based on my review, the exhibit consists predominantly of technical information
3
related to the operation of Apple products, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
4
5
6
7
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on June 2, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.
8
9
/s/ Nathan Greenblatt
Nathan Greenblatt
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT
OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
2
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?