Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 291

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Elan Microelectronics Corporation's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Its Reply to Apple, Inc.'s Opposition to Elan's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement and Supporting Documents filed by Elan Microelectronics Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Liu, Jennifer) (Filed on 6/16/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 YITAI HU (SBN 248085) yitai.hu@alston.com SEAN P. DEBRUINE (SBN 168071) sean.debruine@alston.com ELIZABETH H. RADER (SBN 184963) elizabeth.rader@alston.com JANE HAN BU (SBN 240081) jane.bu@alston.com JENNIFER LIU (SBN 268990) celine.liu@alston.com PALANI P. RATHINASAMY (SBN 269852) palani.rathinasamy@alston.com ALSTON & BIRD LLP 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150 Menlo Park, CA 94025-4008 Telephone: 650-838-2000 Facsimile: 650-838-2001 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 21 22 DECLARATION OF JENNIFER LIU IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, 19 20 Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG) ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant and Counterplaintiff. 23 24 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 25 26 27 28 DECL. OF JENNIFER LIU ISO OF ELAN’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 1 Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG) 1 I, Jennifer Liu, declare as follows: 2 1. I am an attorney with the law firm of Alston & Bird LLP, counsel to Plaintiff Elan 3 Microelectronics Corporation (“Elan”) in this action. I have personal knowledge of the following 4 facts and, if called to testify, I could and would testify competently to the matters stated herein. 5 2. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, Elan seeks to file under seal portions of 6 Elan’s Reply to Apple, Inc.’s (“Apple’s”) Opposition to Elan’s Motion for Partial Summary 7 Judgment of Infringement of U.S. Patent 5,825,352 (“the 352 patent”) and the Declaration of 8 Robert Dezmelyk in Support of Elan’s Reply. 9 3. Elan’s Reply is partially redacted. The redacted portions disclose information 10 quoted or derived from documents that Apple has marked as “Confidential − Attorney Eyes Only” 11 or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code” pursuant to the Amended Protective 12 Order in this matter and confidential communications between Elan and Apple regarding Apple’s 13 infringement of the 352 patent. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, only minimum and 14 necessary redactions regarding Apple’s confidential information and confidential communications 15 between Elan and Apple are made to protect sealable information. 16 4. The Declaration of Robert Dezmelyk in Support of Elan’s Reply is partially 17 redacted. The redacted portions disclose information derived from documents that Apple has 18 marked as “Confidential − Attorney Eyes Only” or “Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source 19 Code” pursuant to the Amended Protective Order in this matter. In accordance with Civil Local 20 Rule 79-5, only minimum and necessary redactions regarding Apple’s confidential information are 21 made to protect sealable information. 22 23 24 5. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, Elan seeks to file under seal Exhibits I- M to the Liu Declaration in Support of Elan’s Reply. 6. Exhibit I to the Liu Declaration in Support of Elan’s Reply is a document that 25 Apple has marked as “Confidential − Attorney Eyes Only” pursuant to the Amended Protective 26 Order in this matter. This document contains Apple confidential internal test data. This exhibit 27 predominately consists of sealable information such that it may be appropriate to seal the entire 28 document rather than requiring submission of a heavily redacted document that would not DECL. OF JENNIFER LIU ISO OF ELAN’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 2 Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG) 1 substantially further the policy of providing public access to, and understanding of, court 2 proceedings. 3 7. Exhibit J to the Liu Declaration in Support of Elan’s Reply is a document that 4 Apple has marked as “Confidential − Attorney Eyes Only” pursuant to the Amended Protective 5 Order in this matter. This document contains a screenshot of Apple confidential internal test data. 6 This exhibit predominately consists of sealable information such that it may be appropriate to seal 7 the entire document rather than requiring submission of a heavily redacted document that would 8 not substantially further the policy of providing public access to, and understanding of, court 9 proceedings. 10 8. Exhibit K to the Liu Declaration in Support of Elan’s Reply is a document that 11 Apple has marked as “Confidential − Attorney Eyes Only” pursuant to the Amended Protective 12 Order in this matter and consists predominantly of confidential communication between Elan and 13 Apple regarding Apple’s infringement of the 352 patent. This exhibit predominately consists of 14 sealable information such that it may be appropriate to seal the entire document rather than 15 requiring submission of a heavily redacted document that would not substantially further the 16 policy of providing public access to, and understanding of, court proceedings. 17 9. Exhibit L to the Liu Declaration in Support of Elan’s Reply is a document that 18 Apple has marked as “Confidential − Attorney Eyes Only” pursuant to the Amended Protective 19 Order in this matter and consists predominantly of confidential communication between Elan and 20 Apple regarding Apple’s infringement of the 352 patent. This exhibit predominately consists of 21 sealable information such that it may be appropriate to seal the entire document rather than 22 requiring submission of a heavily redacted document that would not substantially further the 23 policy of providing public access to, and understanding of, court proceedings. 24 10. Exhibit M to the Liu Declaration in Support of Elan’s Reply is a document that 25 Apple has marked as “Confidential − Attorney Eyes Only” pursuant to the Amended Protective 26 Order in this matter and consists predominantly of confidential communication between Elan and 27 Apple regarding Apple’s infringement of the 352 patent. This exhibit predominately consists of 28 sealable information such that it may be appropriate to seal the entire document rather than DECL. OF JENNIFER LIU ISO OF ELAN’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 3 Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG) 1 requiring submission of a heavily redacted document that would not substantially further the 2 policy of providing public access to, and understanding of, court proceedings. 3 4 5 6 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 16th day of June, 2011 at Menlo Park, California. 7 8 9 10 Jennifer Liu /Jennifer Liu/ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECL. OF JENNIFER LIU ISO OF ELAN’S ADMIN. MOT. TO FILE UNDER SEAL 4 Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?