Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
337
ORDER PERMITTING ADDITIONAL BRIEFING AND CONTINUING HEARING. Motion Hearing set for 8/4/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/11/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2011)
*E-Filed 7/11/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 09-01531 RS
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
12
APPLE, INC.,
13
Defendant.
____________________________________/
10
14
15
ORDER PERMITTING ADDITIONAL
BRIEFING AND CONTINUING
HEARING
Apple seeks leave to file an 11 page surreply in opposition to Elan’s motion for partial
16
summary judgment. Elan objects that the request is untimely, unwarranted, and excessive. In the
17
alternative, Elan requests permission to respond to the surreply. The parties are reminded that
18
effective advocacy often lies in distinguishing between that which is critical or important, and that
19
which is less so. Not every point perceived to be incorrect or irrelevant warrants a response.
20
Admittedly, however, it can be challenging for a party to anticipate with confidence what issues
21
may be of most concern to the court. Accordingly, despite significant skepticism that further
22
briefing will be of material assistance, Apple’s request is granted. Elan may file a response, not to
23
exceed 5 pages, no later than July 21, 2011. The hearing is continued to August 4, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: 7/11/11
26
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
1
NO. C 09‐01531 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?