Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
361
STIPULATION / Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Joint Case Management Conference Statement by Elan Microelectronics Corporation. (DeBruine, Sean) (Filed on 7/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
YITAI HU (SBN 248085)
yitai.hu@alston.com
SEAN P. DEBRUINE (SBN 168071)
sean.debruine@alston.com
ELIZABETH H. RADER (SBN 184963)
elizabeth.rader@alston.com
TSAI-YU (APRIL) CHEN (SBN 264523)
april.chen@alston.com
JANE HAN BU (SBN 240081)
jane.bu@alston.com
JENNIFER LIU (SBN 268990)
celine.liu@alston.com
PALANI P. RATHINASAMY (SBN 269852)
palani.rathinasamy@alston.com
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4008
Telephone:
650-838-2000
Facsimile:
650-838-2001
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION
MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)
matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-6000
Facsimile: (650) 802-6001
JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)
jared.bobrow@weil.com
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
sonal.mehta@weil.com
DEREK C. WALTER (Bar No. 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)
nathan.greenblatt@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff APPLE INC.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
20
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
25
v.
Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE STATEMENT
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
JOIN TCASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG)
1
On July 11, 2011, the Court rescheduled the next Status Conference to August 4, 2011
2
and ordered the parties to submit a Joint Case Management Statement on or before July 28,
3
2011. [Dkt. No. 338, Clerk’s Notice]. Counsel for the parties have met and conferred regarding
4
the witness deposition dates and the overall case schedule, and such scheduling discussion is
5
still on-going. The parties therefore stipulate, and respectfully request that the Court order the
6
filing of the Joint Case Management Statement be continued from July 28, 2011 to August 1,
7
2011. The requested brief continuance would allow the parties to try to finalize an agreed-upon
8
proposed revised case schedule for the Court.
9
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court order that the
10
Case Management Conference Statement, currently due on July 28, 2011, be continued to August
11
1, 2011.
12
DATED: July 28, 2011
13
Respectfully submitted,
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
14
15
By:
/s/ Sean P. DeBruine
Sean P. DeBruine
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION
16
17
18
DATED: July 28, 2011
19
Respectfully submitted,
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
20
21
By:
/s/ Sonal N. Mehta
Sonal N. Mehta
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
22
23
24
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated _____________, 2011
_____________________________
United States District Court Judge
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
JOIN TCASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
1
Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG)
1
2
3
4
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Sean DeBruine,
attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
/s/ Sean Debruine
Sean DeBruine
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
JOIN TCASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
2
Case No. 09-cv-01531 RS (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?