Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 422

Declaration of Nathan Greenblatt in Support of 421 Response to Elan Microelectronics Corporation's Objections to Non-Dispositive Ruling of Magistrate Judge 406 filed byApple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) 421 ) (Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 9/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795) matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-6000 Facsimile: (650) 802-6001 JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712) jared.bobrow@weil.com SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086) sonal.mehta@weil.com DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322) derek.walter@weil.com NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279) nathan.greenblatt@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Apple Inc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, 19 20 21 22 23 v. APPLE INC., Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG) DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC.’S RESPONSE TO ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION'S OBJECTIONS TO NON-DISPOSITIVE RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOCKET NO. 406) Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 24 25 26 27 28 GREENBLATT DECL. ISO APPLE’S RESPONSE TO ELAN'S OBJECTIONS TO NON-DISPOSITIVE RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG) 1 I, Nathan Greenblatt, declare: 2 I am an attorney with the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, counsel of 3 record for Defendant and Counterclaimant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in the above-captioned matter. I 4 submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation. If 5 called upon as a witness, I could competently testify to the truth of each statement herein. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 2008 WL 4415324 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2008). 2. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of E.E.O.C. v. Safeway Store, Inc., 2002 WL31947153 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2002). I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 9, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California. 13 14 /s/ Nathan Greenblatt Nathan Greenblatt 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GREENBLATT DECL. ISO APPLE’S RESPONSE TO ELAN'S OBJECTIONS TO NON-DISPOSITIVE RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?