Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
422
Declaration of Nathan Greenblatt in Support of 421 Response to Elan Microelectronics Corporation's Objections to Non-Dispositive Ruling of Magistrate Judge 406 filed byApple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) 421 ) (Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)
matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-6000
Facsimile: (650) 802-6001
JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)
jared.bobrow@weil.com
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
sonal.mehta@weil.com
DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)
nathan.greenblatt@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
Apple Inc.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
19
20
21
22
23
v.
APPLE INC.,
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
DECLARATION OF NATHAN
GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT OF
APPLE INC.’S RESPONSE TO ELAN
MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION'S OBJECTIONS TO
NON-DISPOSITIVE RULING OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(DOCKET NO. 406)
Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.
24
25
26
27
28
GREENBLATT DECL. ISO APPLE’S RESPONSE TO
ELAN'S OBJECTIONS TO NON-DISPOSITIVE
RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
I, Nathan Greenblatt, declare:
2
I am an attorney with the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, counsel of
3
record for Defendant and Counterclaimant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in the above-captioned matter. I
4
submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation. If
5
called upon as a witness, I could competently testify to the truth of each statement herein.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.
Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Coleman v.
Schwarzenegger, 2008 WL 4415324 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2008).
2.
Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of E.E.O.C. v. Safeway
Store, Inc., 2002 WL31947153 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2002).
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on September 9, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.
13
14
/s/ Nathan Greenblatt
Nathan Greenblatt
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GREENBLATT DECL. ISO APPLE’S RESPONSE TO
ELAN'S OBJECTIONS TO NON-DISPOSITIVE
RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?