Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 443

ORDER granting 442 Motion to Dismiss by Judge Richard Seeborg (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2012)

*E-Filed 1/9/12*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

YITAI HU (SBN 248085)
[e-mail]
SEAN P. DEBRUINE (SBN 168071)
[e-mail]
ELIZABETH H. RADER (SBN 184963)
[e-mail]
JANE HAN BU (SBN 240081)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LIU (SBN 268990)
[e-mail]
PALANI P. RATHINASAMY (SBN 269852)
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4008
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-838-2001
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION

MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)
[e-mail]
TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 306
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)
[e-mail]
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
[e-mail]
DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322)
[e-mail]
NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)
[e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff APPLE INC.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,

18

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,

19
20
21

Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)

v.

Honorable Richard Seeborg

APPLE INC.,

22

Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.

23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)

1

On this day, Plaintiff ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORP. (“Elan”) and

2

Defendant APPLE INC. (“Apple”), announced to the Court that they have settled their respective

3

claims for relief asserted in this case. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion

4

that their request for dismissal should be granted.

5

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against Apple by

6

Elan herein are dismissed, with prejudice, and all counterclaims for relief against Elan by Apple

7

are dismissed with prejudice; and

8
9

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses
shall be borne by each party incurring the same.

10
11
12

9th
Signed this _______ day of January 2012.

___________________________________
HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER
\

1

Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)