Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 54

STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Modifying Time and Manner to Meet and Confer Regarding Settlement by Elan Microelectronics Corporation. (DeBruine, Sean) (Filed on 1/20/2010)

Download PDF
Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 54 1 Kristin Henry (CA Bar No. 220908) Sierra Club 2 85 Second Street San Francisco, CA 94104 3 (415) 977-5716 (415) 977-5793 FAX 4 kristin.henry@sierraclub.org 5 David Bookbinder (DC Bar No. 455525) Pro Hac Vice Sierra Club 6 408 C. Street, NE Washington, DC 200002-5818 7 (202) 548-4598 (202) 547-6009 FAX 8 david.bookbinder@sierraclub.org 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 KEVIN V. RYAN (SBN 118321) United States Attorney 11 JOANN M. SWANSON (SBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division 12 JAMES A. CODA (SBN 1012669 (WI)) Assistant United States Attorney 13 Environment & Natural Resources Unit 14 15 16 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone No: (415) 436-6967 Facsimile No: (415) 436-6748 james.coda@usdoj.gov 17 Attorneys for Defendants 18 19 20 21 SIERRA CLUB, 22 23 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) CIVIL NO. 06-3997 CRB ) ) STIPULATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 24 DONALD RUMSFELD, et al., 25 26 27 28 Defendants. The parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that the Defendants shall have until October 2, 2006, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Dockets.Justia.com 1 Date: 8/23/06 2 s/David Bookbinder DAVID BOOKBINDER Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 4 5 6 Date: 8/23/06 7 8 9 s/James A. Coda JAMES A. CODA Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants Defendants' counsel attests that the wording of this document is acceptable to Plaintiff's KEVIN V. RYAN United States Attorney 10 counsel. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S T I P U L A T I O N ; C I V I L N O . 06-3997 C R B 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?