Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
68
Unopposed Motion to Extend The Claim Construction Briefing Schedule and Markman Hearing Date filed by Apple, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 (Proposed) Order)(Mehta, Sonal) (Filed on 3/11/2010) Modified on 3/12/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF).
Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Doc. 68
1 J. DAVID NICK #157687
506 Broadway
2 San Francisco CA 94133
Telephone: 415/986-5591
3
Attorney for Defendant
4 CODY DOBBS 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff, v.
CR 06-711 SI EX PARTE MOTION TO CONTINUE STATUS DATE
14 CODY DOBBS, 15 16
Defendant. /
Date: December 18, 2006 Time: 9:30 a.m. Mag. Judge Chen
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT AND TO THE UNITED
17 STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: 18
COMES NOW defendant, through counsel, and hereby moves to
19 continue the status date now set for said date and time before 20 the Magistrate Judge. 21 22
In support of said request, counsel declares: I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of
23 California and before this court, and I am the attorney for 24 defendant Cody Dobbs herein. 25
The purpose of the hearing on December 18, 2006, is to
26 confirm the posting of the property bond in the above-entitled 27 matter.
LAW OFFICES
5 0 6 BROADW A Y S A N FRANCISCO ( 4 1 5 ) 986-5591 F a x : (415) 421-1331
The property bond has been posted with Magistrate Judge However, the appraisal of
28 Nandor Vadas in Eureka, California.
1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 the property cannot be accomplished until January 2, 2007, due 2 to the rural nature of the property and the appraiser's backlog. 3 The appraiser has informed defendant that the written report 4 will be completed by January 12, 2007. 5
A continuance is also respectfully requested because
6 counsel has a sentencing hearing in the Eastern District of 7 California, Sacramento, in the matter of United States v. David 8 Harde, CR O6-270 FCD, on December 18, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. 9
Assistant United States Attorney Kirsten Ault has advised
10 counsel that she opposes any continuance without a court 11 hearing.
Counsel believes it would be in the interests of
12 justice to vacate the current date of December 18, 2006, and set 13 a new status date of January 12, 2007.
However, if the Court so
14 requires, the matter can be advanced to December 15, 2006, at 15 9:30 a.m.
Although counsel will not be available on that day,
16 he can arrange for another attorney to appear, since there is a 17 status hearing in this matter before District Court Judge Susan 18 Illston at 11:00 a.m. on that day as well. 19
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the status
20 hearing be continued to January 12, 2007; or in the alternative, 21 advanced to December 15, 2007, for hearing on the motion to 22 continue. 23
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is
24 true and correct, and that this declaration is executed on 25 December 12, 2006, at San Francisco, California. 26 27
LAW OFFICES
5 0 6 BROADW A Y S A N FRANCISCO ( 4 1 5 ) 986-5591 F a x : (415) 421-1331
/s/ J. DAVID NICK J. DAVID NICK
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?