Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 80

MOTION to Shorten Time for Hearing on Elan's Motion to Stay Pending Final Determination by the ITC of Investigation No. 337-TA-714 filed by Elan Microelectronics Corporation. (DeBruine, Sean) (Filed on 4/27/2010) Modified on 4/28/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E. JEFFREY GRUBE (SB# 167324) jeffgrube@paulhastings.com THOMAS E. GEIDT (SB# 80955) tomgeidt@paulhastings.com KERRI N. HARPER (SB# 217377) kerriharper@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street Twent y-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GREGORY NEAL GRIMES, Plaint iff, vs. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; and DOES 1-10; Defendants. CASE NO. 3:05-CV-01824-CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS Date: Time: Dept: Judge: November 8, 2007 10:00 am Courtroom 8, 19th Floor Honorable Charles R. Breyer Good cause having been found, Defendant's motion to remove incorrectly filed documents, Docket No. 199--Stipulation That Documents Produced By Plaintiff Concerning 2002 TRO Proceedings Are Authentic by United Parcel Service. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1# (2) Exhibit 2# (3) Exhibit 3# (4) Exhibit 4# (5) Exhibit 5# (6) Exhibit 6# (7) Exhibit 7# (8) Exhibit 8# (9) Exhibit 9# (10) Exhibit 9-2# (11) Exhibit 9-3# (12) Exhibit 9-4# (13) Exhibit 10# (14) Exhibit 10-2# (15) Exhibit 10-3# (16) Exhibit 10-4# (17) Exhibit 10-5# (18) Exhibit 106)(Grube, E.) (Filed on 10/2/2007), is GRANTED. DATED: _________________ _____________________________________ District Court Judge CASE NO. 3:05-CV-01824-CRB LEGAL_US_W # 57219562.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?