Kindle v. Astrue
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE re 35 Stipulation filed by Michael J. Astrue. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on September 8, 2010. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MELINDA L. HAAG, CSBN 132612 United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration DANIEL P. TALBERT, SBN OH 84088 Special Assistant United States Attorney 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8926 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Daniel.Talbert@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KATHERINE KINDLE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) COMMISSIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) No. 5:09-CV-01624-PVT
XXXXXXXXX STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the Status Conference, presently scheduled for September 14, 2010, at 2:00 pm, be moved to September 21, 2010, at 2:00 pm. This continuance is necessary because Defense counsel needs to travel out of state to attend a continuing legal education course.
KINDLE V. ASTRUE, 5:09-CV-1624-PVT
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Dated: September 7, 2010 Dated: September 7, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Harvey Sackett (as authorized via email) HARVEY SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney By s/ Daniel P. Talbert DANIEL P. TALBERT Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9/8/2010 DATED:________________
_________________________________ PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
KINDLE V. ASTRUE, 5:09-CV-1624-PVT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?