Salazar et al v. Four Elements Inc. et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER 20 to Dismiss With Prejudice, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/23/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233 ADAM PEDERSEN, Bar No. 261901 LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG 12 South First Street, Suite 708 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: (408) 292-1040 Fax: (408) 416-0248 waqw@sbcglobal.net Attorney for Plaintiffs *E-FILED - 6/23/10* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Hernandez, et. al., Plaintiffs, vs. 4E Inc. dba Four Elements , et. al., Defendants Case No.: 09-CV-1679-RMW STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE & [] ORDER THEREON Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Parties have reached a settlement with respect to all claims of all Plaintiffs against all Defendants in this case. 2. prejudice. As such, parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this action in its entirety with 1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Hernandez, et. al. v. Four Elements, et. al. 09-cv-1679-RMW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3. The Parties stipulate that this Court should retain its jurisdiction over this case for the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement, and parties will bear their own costs and fees, subject to the terms the settlement agreement. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Dated: May 28, 2010 By: /s/ Adam Pedersen ADAM PEDERSEN Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: May 28, 2010 By: ___/s/Michael Farbstein____ MICHAEL FARBSTEIN Attorney for Defendants ______________________________________________________ [] ORDER Pursuant to party's stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6/23 Dated: ____________, 2010 _________________________ Hon. R. M. Whyte United States District Court Judge 2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Hernandez, et. al. v. Four Elements, et. al. 09-cv-1679-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?