Embry v. ACER America Corporation
Filing
166
ORDER re 165 Stipulation filed by ACER America Corporation, Set/Reset Deadlines 165 Stipulation, 150 MOTION to Certify Class PLAINTIFFS RENEWED MOTION; MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF [REDACTED] MOTION to Certify Class PLAINTIFFS RENEWE D MOTION; MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF [REDACTED]. Opposition due by 7/25/2011. Replies due by 8/29/2011. Motion Hearing set for 9/12/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/30/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)
4
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
es Ware
NO
RT
6
m
Judge Ja
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
C
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 KEVIN EMBRY, an individual, on behalf of
himself, the general public and those similarly
11 situated,
12
13
A
H
ER
LI
5
R NIA
3
FO
UNIT
ED
2
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
1
Plaintiff,
vs.
14 ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; AND
DOES 1 THROUGH 50,
15
Defendants.
16
CASE NO. CV-09-1808 JW (HRL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
STIPULATION CONCERNING
BRIEFING FOR PLAINTIFF’S
RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
Hon. Judge James Ware
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
03926.22689/4119848.2
Case No. CV-09-1808 JW (HRL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered the parties’ Stipulation Concerning Briefing for Plaintiff’s Renewed
3 Motion for Class Certification, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the new the
4 new briefing dates will be as follows:
5
Opposition Due: July 25, 2011
6
Reply Due: August 29, 2011
7
Hearing: September 12, 2011 (unchanged)
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
30
Dated: June ___, 2011
11
12
__________________________________________
The Honorable James Ware
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
03926.22689/4119848.2
-1-
Case No. CV-09-1808 JW (HRL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?