Embry v. ACER America Corporation

Filing 191

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 190 Stipulation filed by Kevin Embry. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/28/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 S DISTRICT TE C TA Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 13 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Jeffery D. McFarland (Bar No. 157628) jeffmcfarland@quinnemanuel.com Stan Karas (Bar No. 222402) stankaras@quinnemanuel.com A.J. Bedel (Bar No. 243603) ajbedel@quinnemanuel.com 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 14 Attorneys for Defendant ACER AMERICA CORPORATION 10 11 12 R NIA es Ware LI ER FO m Judge Ja A H 9 RT 5 ERED O ORD IT IS S NO 4 UNIT ED 3 S 7 2 RT U O 6 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446) adam@gutridesafier.com SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427) 835 Douglass Street seth@gutridesafier.com L. JAY KUO (State Bar No. 173293) jay@gutridesafier.com San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 336-6545 Facsimile: (415) 449-6469 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 22 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION KEVIN EMBRY, an individual, on behalf of himself, the general public and those similarly situated Plaintiff, v. 23 24 ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 50 25 26 27 28 Defendants CASE NO. CV-09-01808 (JW) STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO PROVIDE AMENDED CLAIM FORM AND PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER 1 TO THE COURT: 2 WHEREAS, on September 20, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to submit a revised 3 proposed order on the motion for preliminary approval as well as a revised claim form, on or 4 before September 26, 2011, with directions to “revise the Proposed Order to address the question 5 of what relief will be available to those class members whose computers do not have an internal 6 CD drive” (Dkt.# 188) (“September 20 Order”); 7 WHEREAS, Acer has confirmed that approximately 70% of the computers sold during the 8 class period were shipped with an internal CD or DVD drive, and Acer is attempting to determine 9 what additional percentage may have been sold with an external CD or DVD drive; 10 11 12 WHEREAS, Microsoft has informed Acer that Microsoft will not permit the Windows recovery utilities to be distributed via download from the Internet; WHEREAS, the parties are currently researching whether the Windows recovery utilities 13 might be provided to class members in a format other than CD or DVD, which requires Acer to 14 seek approval of Microsoft and to determine the cost of alternative formats; 15 NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY JOINTLY REQUEST that the Court 16 extend the time for the parties to comply with the September 20 Order until October 3, 2011. 17 DATED: September 26, 2011 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP 18 19 By:/s/ Adam Gutride ________________________ Adam Gutride Seth A. Safier Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Embry 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: September 26, 2011 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By:/s/ Jeff McFarland________________________ Jeffery D. McFarland Stan Karas A.J. Bedel Attorneys for Defendant Acer America Corporation STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME RE REVISED PRELIM. APPROVAL ORDER– EMBRY V. ACER, CASE 09-1808 1 1 2 3 4 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 28 ______________, 2011 5 6 7 8 _________________________________________ Honorable James Ware United States District Court Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME RE REVISED PRELIM. APPROVAL ORDER– EMBRY V. ACER, CASE 09-1808 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?