Embry v. ACER America Corporation
Filing
191
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 190 Stipulation filed by Kevin Embry. Signed by Judge James Ware on 9/28/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
13
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP
Jeffery D. McFarland (Bar No. 157628)
jeffmcfarland@quinnemanuel.com
Stan Karas (Bar No. 222402)
stankaras@quinnemanuel.com
A.J. Bedel (Bar No. 243603)
ajbedel@quinnemanuel.com
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone:
(213) 443-3000
Facsimile:
(213) 443-3100
14
Attorneys for Defendant ACER AMERICA CORPORATION
10
11
12
R NIA
es Ware
LI
ER
FO
m
Judge Ja
A
H
9
RT
5
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
4
UNIT
ED
3
S
7
2
RT
U
O
6
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446)
adam@gutridesafier.com
SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427)
835 Douglass Street
seth@gutridesafier.com
L. JAY KUO (State Bar No. 173293)
jay@gutridesafier.com
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 336-6545
Facsimile: (415) 449-6469
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
22
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
KEVIN EMBRY, an individual, on behalf of
himself, the general public and those similarly
situated
Plaintiff,
v.
23
24
ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; AND
DOES 1 THROUGH 50
25
26
27
28
Defendants
CASE NO. CV-09-01808 (JW)
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
ADDITIONAL TIME TO PROVIDE
AMENDED CLAIM FORM AND
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER
1
TO THE COURT:
2
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to submit a revised
3
proposed order on the motion for preliminary approval as well as a revised claim form, on or
4
before September 26, 2011, with directions to “revise the Proposed Order to address the question
5
of what relief will be available to those class members whose computers do not have an internal
6
CD drive” (Dkt.# 188) (“September 20 Order”);
7
WHEREAS, Acer has confirmed that approximately 70% of the computers sold during the
8
class period were shipped with an internal CD or DVD drive, and Acer is attempting to determine
9
what additional percentage may have been sold with an external CD or DVD drive;
10
11
12
WHEREAS, Microsoft has informed Acer that Microsoft will not permit the Windows
recovery utilities to be distributed via download from the Internet;
WHEREAS, the parties are currently researching whether the Windows recovery utilities
13
might be provided to class members in a format other than CD or DVD, which requires Acer to
14
seek approval of Microsoft and to determine the cost of alternative formats;
15
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY JOINTLY REQUEST that the Court
16
extend the time for the parties to comply with the September 20 Order until October 3, 2011.
17
DATED:
September 26, 2011
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
18
19
By:/s/ Adam Gutride ________________________
Adam Gutride
Seth A. Safier
Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Embry
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED:
September 26, 2011
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &
HEDGES, LLP
By:/s/ Jeff McFarland________________________
Jeffery D. McFarland
Stan Karas
A.J. Bedel
Attorneys for Defendant Acer America
Corporation
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME RE REVISED PRELIM. APPROVAL ORDER–
EMBRY V. ACER, CASE 09-1808
1
1
2
3
4
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
September 28
______________, 2011
5
6
7
8
_________________________________________
Honorable James Ware
United States District Court Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME RE REVISED PRELIM. APPROVAL ORDER–
EMBRY V. ACER, CASE 09-1808
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?