Embry v. ACER America Corporation
Filing
193
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 192 Stipulation filed by Kevin Embry. Signed by Judge James Ware on 10/5/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)
1
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP
Jeffery D. McFarland (Bar No. 157628)
S DISTRICT
jeffmcfarland@quinnemanuel.com
TE
C
TA
Stan Karas (Bar No. 222402)
stankaras@quinnemanuel.com
A.J. Bedel (Bar No. 243603)
D
ajbedel@quinnemanuel.com
RDERE
S SO O
IT I
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone:
(213) 443-3000
re
Facsimile:
(213) 443-3100
mes Wa
Judge Ja
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant ACER AMERICA CORPORATION
RT
14
NO
13
R NIA
10
ER
H
15
FO
9
LI
5
A
4
S
3
UNIT
ED
2
RT
U
O
6
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446)
adam@gutridesafier.com
SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427)
835 Douglass Street
seth@gutridesafier.com
L. JAY KUO (State Bar No. 173293)
jay@gutridesafier.com
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 336-6545
Facsimile: (415) 449-6469
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
C
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
21
22
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
KEVIN EMBRY, an individual, on behalf of
himself, the general public and those similarly
situated
Plaintiff,
v.
23
24
ACER AMERICA CORPORATION; AND
DOES 1 THROUGH 50
25
26
27
28
Defendants
CASE NO. CV-09-01808 (JW)
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
ADDITIONAL TIME TO PROVIDE
AMENDED CLAIM FORM AND
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER
1
TO THE COURT:
2
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2011, the Court ordered the parties, on or before
3
September 26, 2011, to “revise the Proposed Order to address the question of what relief will be
4
available to those class members whose computers do not have an internal CD drive” (Dkt.# 188)
5
(“September 20 Order”)
6
7
WHEREAS, on September 28, 2011, in response to the parties’ stipulated request, the
Court extended the deadline until October 3, 2011;
8
WHEREAS, Acer has not yet been able (1) to attain approval from Microsoft to distribute
9
the Windows recovery utilities to class members in a format other than CD or DVD, (2) obtain a
10
list of vendor(s) whom Microsoft would approve to create those format(s), or (3) determine the
11
cost of doing so;
12
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS, Acer must communicate with Microsoft through Acer employees in Taiwan;
and
WHEREAS, Acer hopes that it will have received the necessary information in the next
week or at most the next fourteen days,
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY JOINTLY REQUEST that the Court
17
extend the time for the parties to comply with the September 20 Order until October 17, 2011.
18
DATED:
October 3, 2011
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
19
20
By:/s/ Adam Gutride ________________________
Adam Gutride
Seth A. Safier
Attorneys for Plaintiff Kevin Embry
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED:
October 3, 2011
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &
HEDGES, LLP
By:/s/ Jeff McFarland________________________
Jeffery D. McFarland
Stan Karas
A.J. Bedel
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME RE REVISED PRELIM. APPROVAL ORDER–
EMBRY V. ACER, CASE 09-1808
1
1
Attorneys for Defendant Acer America
Corporation
2
3
4
5
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
October 5
______________, 2011
6
7
8
9
_________________________________________
Honorable James Ware
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME RE REVISED PRELIM. APPROVAL ORDER–
EMBRY V. ACER, CASE 09-1808
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?