Lanagan v. Santa Cruz County Metro Transit District

Filing 69

ORDER GRANTING 68 Defendant's counsel's request to appear by telephone. Mr. Shureen shall initiate the call to the Court via CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 just prior to the time appointed for the conference. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 07/30/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2010)

Download PDF
Lanagan v. Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District Doc. 69 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION ** E-filed July 30, 2010 ** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION DOROTHY LANAGAN, v. Plaintiff, No. C09-01835 HRL ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE [Re: Docket No. 68] United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California SANTA CRUZ METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Having considered Defendant's counsel's request to appear by telephone at the hearing set for August 10, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., and good cause appearing, the Court grants the request. Mr. Shureen shall initiate the call to the Court via CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 just prior to the time appointed for the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 30, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C09-01835 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Donald Douglas Shureen doug.shureen@mcmillanshureen.com, sonja.gray@mcmillanshureen.com Notice will be provided by other means to: Dorothy Lanagan 631 Bronte Avenue Watsonville, CA 95076 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?