JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Roberts

Filing 35

ORDER re Plaintiff's Current Pro Se Status. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 11/1/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 11/3/2010)

Download PDF
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Roberts Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CYNTHIA ROBERTS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ) AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 09-1855 PVT (Consolidated with Case No. C 09-1879) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S CURRENT PRO SE STATUS As the court previously noted, Plaintiff's former attorney resigned from the bar and is no longer eligible to practice law. Thus, although Plaintiff has not substituted herself in pro se, and although the court has referred Plaintiff to the federal Pro Bono Project, Plaintiff is currently essentially representing herself pro se. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall modify the docket to reflect the fact that Timothy Douglas Thurman no longer represents Plaintiff and Plaintiff is currently representing herself unless and until an attorney is appointed through the Federal Pro Bono Project Dated: 11/3/10 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OR D E R, page 2 /s/ Donna Kirchner OSCAR RIVERA Courtroom Deputy for copies mailed on 11/3/10 to: Cynthia Roberts 107 Silverwood Dr. Scotts Valley, CA 95066

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?